Cited by 502Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Laplacian Pyramid Reconstruction and Refinement for Semantic Segmentation

Open access
Ghiasi, Golnaz, Fowlkes, Charless C.·2016·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-46487-9_32

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sharing features improves accuracy by a small margin.

    “Similar to [29], we find that sharing features improves accuracy by a small margin.”

    From Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection (2017) · cites this paper as [29]

    Section 4 (p. 8) reports modest accuracy gains from fusing feature maps at multiple resolutions, although adding the 4x layer yields no gain or a decrease. That supports the direction and small size of the reported improvement, but the paper describes feature fusion rather than an experiment on sharing features. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fast and Faster R-CNN opt to not use featurized image pyramids under default settings.

    “For these reasons, Fast and Faster R-CNN [11, 29] opt to not use featurized image pyramids under default settings.”

    From Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection (2017) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Related Work section (p. 3) discusses multi-resolution features for semantic segmentation, and the results (p. 8) discuss multi-scale testing of the authors’ model. Neither passage addresses whether Fast or Faster R-CNN omit featurized image pyramids by default; searches for those models and that setting found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For fair comparisons with original RPNs, the baselines use the same hyper-parameters as FPN.

    “For fair comparisons with original RPNs [29], we run two baselines (Table 1(a, b)) using the single-scale map of C 4 (the same as [16]) or C 5 , both using the same hyper-parameters as ours, including using 5 scale anchors of { 32 2 , 64 2 , 128 2 , 256 2 , 512 2 } .”

    From Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection (2017) · cites this paper as [29]

    The citation is attached to “original RPNs,” but our copy describes an LRR semantic-segmentation model, not an RPN (Introduction, p. 2). Its comparison with an FCN baseline (Section 5.2, p. 10) does not address the claimed C4/C5 baselines, FPN hyper-parameters, or anchor scales; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]2. Carreira, J., Li, F., Sminchisescu, C.: Object recognition by sequential figureground ranking. IJCV 98(3), 243-262 (2012)
  2. [9]9. Dai, J., He, K., Sun, J.: Convolutional feature masking for joint object and stuff segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.1283 (2014) · arXiv
  3. [30]30. Uhrig, J., Cordts, M., Franke, U., Brox, T.: Pixel-level encoding and depth layering for instance-level semantic labeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.05096 (2016) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghiasi, G., & Fowlkes, C. C.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Ghiasi, Golnaz
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2016
Pages
519-534
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2508741746
Cited by
502
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 10
FWCI
25.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1253538, 1262547)
  • Nvidia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
semantic segmentation, Laplacian pyramid, multi-resolution reconstruction, sub-pixel localization, skip connections, boundary refinement, spatial pooling, feature maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review