Cited by 1,066Image Enhancement TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising MethodsAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

Density-Aware Single Image De-raining Using a Multi-stream Dense Network

Open access
Zhang, He, Patel, Vishal M.·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Single image rain streak removal is an extremely challenging problem due to the presence of non-uniform rain densities in images. We present a novel density-aware multi-stream densely connected convolutional neural network-based algorithm, called DID-MDN, for joint rain density estimation and de-raining. The proposed method enables the network itself to automatically determine the rain-density information and then efficiently remove the corresponding rain-streaks guided by the estimated rain-density label. To better characterize rain-streaks with different scales and shapes, a multi-stream densely connected de-raining network is proposed which efficiently leverages features from different scales. Furthermore, a new dataset containing images with rain-density labels is created and used to train the proposed density-aware network. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves significant improvements over the recent state-of-the-art methods. In addition, an ablation study is performed to demonstrate the improvements obtained by different modules in the proposed method. The code can be downloaded at https://github.com/hezhangsprinter/DID-MDN.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00079

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitatively, Hoa et al.'s proposed algorithm, as well as Qian's and DID-MDN, removed most raindrops successfully.

    “Qualitatively, the proposed algorithm, as well as Qian’s and the DIID-MDN removed most raindrops successfully.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., & Patel, V. M.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
695-704
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964212750
Cited by
1,066
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 140 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 19
FWCI
29.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
single image rain removal, rain streak removal, multi-stream network, DenseNet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review