The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answering
Open accessAbstract
Top-down visual attention mechanisms have been used extensively in image captioning and visual question answering (VQA) to enable deeper image understanding through fine-grained analysis and even multiple steps of reasoning. In this work, we propose a combined bottom-up and top-down attention mechanism that enables attention to be calculated at the level of objects and other salient image regions. This is the natural basis for attention to be considered. Within our approach, the bottom-up mechanism (based on Faster R-CNN) proposes image regions, each with an associated feature vector, while the top-down mechanism determines feature weightings. Applying this approach to image captioning, our results on the MSCOCO test server establish a new state-of-the-art for the task, achieving CIDEr / SPICE / BLEU-4 scores of 117.9, 21.5 and 36.9, respectively. Demonstrating the broad applicability of the method, applying the same approach to VQA we obtain first place in the 2017 VQA Challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
(2016) · Cited by 31,590
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., & Zhu, W.-J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02 · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073135 · Cited by 21,344
Cited by
Items 101–125 of 125
Towards Visual Dialog for Radiology
Kovaleva, O., Shivade, C., Kashyap, S., Kanjaria, K., Wu, J., Ballah, D., Coy, A., Karargyris, A., Guo, Y., Beymer, D. B., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 19th SIGBioMed Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.bionlp-1.6 · Cited by 38
Dynamic Graph Representation Learning for Video Dialog via Multi-Modal Shuffled Transformers
Geng, S., Gao, P., Chatterjee, M., Hori, C., Le Roux, J., Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Cherian, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i2.16231 · Cited by 38
COOKIE: Contrastive Cross-Modal Knowledge Sharing Pre-training for Vision-Language Representation
Wen, K., Xia, J., Huang, Y., Li, L., Xu, J., & Shao, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00221 · Cited by 37
ManyModalQA: Modality Disambiguation and QA over Diverse Inputs
Hannan, D., Jain, A., & Bansal, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6294 · Cited by 37
MusCaps: Generating Captions for Music Audio
Manco, I., Benetos, E., Quinton, E., & Fazekas, G. (2021) · 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533461 · Cited by 36
“The attention model used is a soft top-down attention mechanism, similar to approaches first proposed for the image captioning task in [5], [32].”
MethodVisQA: X-raying Vision and Language Reasoning in Transformers
Jaunet, T., Kervadec, C., Vuillemot, R., Antipov, G., Baccouche, M., & Wolf, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3114683 · Cited by 30
Multi-Modal Dynamic Graph Transformer for Visual Grounding
Chen, S., & Li, B. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01509 · Cited by 28
Human gaze-aware attentive object detection for ambient intelligence
Cho, D.-Y., & Kang, M.-K. (2021) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104471 · Cited by 26
How Transferable are Reasoning Patterns in VQA?
Kervadec, C., Jaunet, T., Antipov, G., Baccouche, M., Vuillemot, R., & Wolf, C. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00419 · Cited by 25
An overview of key trustworthiness attributes and KPIs for trusted ML-based systems engineering
Mattioli, J., Sohier, H., Delaborde, A., Amokrane-Ferka, K., Awadid, A., Chihani, Z., Khalfaoui, S., & Pedroza, G. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00394-2 · Cited by 22
An Investigation of Critical Issues in Bias Mitigation Techniques
Shrestha, R., Kafle, K., & Kanan, C. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00257 · Cited by 22
CLEVR-X: A Visual Reasoning Dataset for Natural Language Explanations
Salewski, L., Koepke, A. S., Lensch, H. P. A., & Akata, Z. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04083-2_5 · Cited by 20
Bridging the Gap between 2D and 3D Visual Question Answering: A Fusion Approach for 3D VQA
Mo, W., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i5.28222 · Cited by 20
Abdulgalil, H. D., & Basir, O. A. (2025) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100159 · Cited by 20
Automatic Medical Image Report Generation with Multi-view and Multi-modal Attention Mechanism
Yang, S., Niu, J., Wu, J., & Liu, X. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60248-2_48 · Cited by 17
A Survey of Multimodal Sarcasm Detection
Farabi, S., Ranasinghe, T., Kanojia, D., Kong, Y., & Zampieri, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the Thirty-ThirdInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/887 · Cited by 17
Guiding Visual Question Generation
Vedd, N., Wang, Z., Rei, M., Miao, Y., & Specia, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.118 · Cited by 12
What BERT Sees: Cross-Modal Transfer for Visual Question Generation
Scialom, T., Bordes, P., Dray, P.-A., Staiano, J., & Gallinari, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Natural Language Generation · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.inlg-1.39 · Cited by 9
Vision to Language: Methods, Metrics and Datasets
Sharif, N., Nadeem, U., Shah, S. A. A., Bennamoun, M., & Liu, W. (2020) · Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49724-8_2 · Cited by 9
EXCALIBUR: Encouraging and Evaluating Embodied Exploration
Zhu, H., Kapoor, R., Min, S. Y., Han, W., Li, J., Geng, K., Neubig, G., Bisk, Y., Kembhavi, A., & Weihs, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01434 · Cited by 9
Cai, L., Fang, H., & Li, Z. (2023) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-023-05195-2 · Cited by 8
An Image Captioning Model Based on Bidirectional Depth Residuals and its Application
Zhou, Z., Xu, L., Wang, C., Xie, W., Wang, S., Ge, S., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3057091 · Cited by 6
Chart Accessibility: A Review of Current Alt Text Generation
Yan, C., Hutter, H.-P., Schmitt-Koopmann, F. M., & Darvishy, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3571626 · Cited by 5
Probabilistic framework for solving visual dialog
Patro, B. N., Anupriy, & Namboodiri, V. P. (2021) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107586 · Cited by 4
AdaCoder: Adaptive Prompt Compression for Programmatic Visual Question Answering
Ukai, M., Kurita, S., Hashimoto, A., Ushiku, Y., & Inoue, N. (2024) · Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3664647.3681010 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, P., He, X., Buehler, C., Teney, D., Johnson, M., Gould, S., & Zhang, L.
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-06
- Pages
- 6077-6086
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2745461083
- Cited by
- 4,948
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 159.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.