Cited by 352Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Diversify and Match: A Domain Adaptive Representation Learning Paradigm for Object Detection

Open access
Kim, Taekyung, Jeong, Minki, Kim, Seunghyeon, Choi, Seokeon, Kim, Changick·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

We introduce a novel unsupervised domain adaptation approach for object detection. We aim to alleviate the imperfect translation problem of pixel-level adaptations, and the source-biased discriminativity problem of feature-level adaptations simultaneously. Our approach is composed of two stages, i.e., Domain Diversification (DD) and Multi-domain-invariant Representation Learning (MRL). At the DD stage, we diversify the distribution of the labeled data by generating various distinctive shifted domains from the source domain. At the MRL stage, we apply adversarial learning with a multi-domain discriminator to encourage feature to be indistinguishable among the domains. DD addresses the source-biased discriminativity, while MRL mitigates the imperfect image translation. We construct a structured domain adaptation framework for our learning paradigm and introduce a practical way of DD for implementation. Our method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a large margin of 3%~11% in terms of mean average precision (mAP) on various datasets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2019.01274

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cycle-consistent transformation has also been applied to bridge the gap between source and target domain.

    “Cycle-consistent transformation [222] has also been applied to bridge the gap between source and target domain [223, 224].”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [223]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, T., Jeong, M., Kim, S., Choi, S., & Kim, C.
Affiliations
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
12448-12457
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969583814
Cited by
352
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
18.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (2017-0-01772)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
unsupervised domain adaptation, object detection, adversarial learning, cross-domain image translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review