The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Filter Pruning Criteria for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Acceleration
Open accessAbstract
Filter pruning has been widely applied to neural network compression and acceleration. Existing methods usually utilize pre-defined pruning criteria, such as Lp-norm, to prune unimportant filters. There are two major limitations to these methods. First, existing methods fail to consider the variety of filter distribution across layers. To extract features of the coarse level to the fine level, the filters of different layers have various distributions. Therefore, it is not suitable to utilize the same pruning criteria to different functional layers. Second, prevailing layer-by-layer pruning methods process each layer independently and sequentially, failing to consider that all the layers in the network collaboratively make the final prediction. In this paper, we propose Learning Filter Pruning Criteria (LFPC) to solve the above problems. Specifically, we develop a differentiable pruning criteria sampler. This sampler is learnable and optimized by the validation loss of the pruned network obtained from the sampled criteria. In this way, we could adaptively select the appropriate pruning criteria for different functional layers. Besides, when evaluating the sampled criteria, LFPC comprehensively consider the contribution of all the layers at the same time. Experiments validate our approach on three image classification benchmarks. Notably, on ILSVRC-2012, our LFPC reduces more than 60% FLOPs on ResNet-50 with only 0.83% top-5 accuracy loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pruning is the well-studied topic in model compression and many methods have been proposed to advance the network pruning [103].”
From Bringing ai to edge: from deep learning’s perspective (2022) · cites this paper as [103]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
(2017) · Cited by 11,625
Identity mappings in deep residual networks
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38 · Cited by 10,741
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6199 · Cited by 8,143
Zagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2016) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2016 · doi:10.5244/c.30.87 · Cited by 7,244
Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01578 · Cited by 5,705
SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts
Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.03983 · Cited by 5,309
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- carreira-perpinán, 0, learning-compression” algorithms for neural net pruning, CVPR
- han, 0, Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural network, NeurIPS
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unbiased Scene Graph Generation From Biased Training
Tang, K., Niu, Y., Huang, J., Shi, J., & Zhang, H. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00377 · Cited by 810
Self-citationStructured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey
He, Y., & Xiao, L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3334614 · Cited by 468
Self-citationLightweight Deep Learning for Resource-Constrained Environments: A Survey
Liu, H.-I., Galindo, M., Xie, H., Wong, L.-K., Shuai, H.-H., Li, Y., & Cheng, W.-H. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3657282 · Cited by 332
Quantization and Deployment of Deep Neural Networks on Microcontrollers
Novac, P.-E., Hacene, G. B., Pégatoquet, A., Miramond, B., & Gripon, V. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21092984 · Cited by 250
ResRep: Lossless CNN Pruning via Decoupling Remembering and Forgetting
Ding, X., Hao, T., Tan, J., Liu, J., Han, J., Guo, Y., & Ding, G. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00447 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- He, Y., Ding, Y., Liu, P., Zhu, L., Zhang, H., & Yang, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Baidu (China) (CN)
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-06
- Pages
- 2006-2015
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3035467254
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 13.50
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- filter pruning, neural network compression, deep convolutional neural networks, layer-wise pruning, model acceleration, FLOPs reduction, image classification, ResNet50
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
