Cited by 57Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

M3P: Learning Universal Representations via Multitask Multilingual Multimodal Pre-training

Ni, Minheng, Huang, Haoyang, Su, Lin, Cui, Edward, Bharti, Taroon, Wang, Lijuan, Zhang, Dongdong, Duan, Nan·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

We present M3P, a Multitask Multilingual Multimodal Pre-trained model that combines multilingual pre-training and multimodal pre-training into a unified framework via multitask pre-training. Our goal is to learn universal representations that can map objects occurred in different modalities or texts expressed in different languages into a common semantic space. In addition, to explicitly encourage fine-grained alignment between images and non-English languages, we also propose Multimodal Code-switched Training (MCT) to combine monolingual pre-training and multimodal pre-training via a code-switch strategy. Experiments are performed on the multilingual image retrieval task across two benchmark datasets, including MSCOCO and Multi30K. M3P can achieve comparable results for English and new state-of-the-art results for non-English languages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00397

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-supervised learning does not rely on large amounts of manually labeled data and can be trained on unlabeled data.

    “Self-supervised learning does not rely on large amounts of manually labeled data and can be trained using unlabeled data [184].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ni, M., Huang, H., Su, L., Cui, E., Bharti, T., Wang, L., Zhang, D., & Duan, N.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
3976-3985
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177654849
Cited by
57
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
universal representation, multilingual pre-training, multimodal pre-training, multi-task learning, code-switching, image-text alignment, non-English languages, cross-lingual representation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review