CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1,586Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Cross-lingual Language Model Pretraining

Open access
Lample, Guillaume, Conneau, Alexis·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1901.07291arXiv 1901.07291
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the efficiency of generative pretraining for English natural language understanding. In this work, we extend this approach to multiple languages and show the effectiveness of cross-lingual pretraining. We propose two methods to learn cross-lingual language models (XLMs): one unsupervised that only relies on monolingual data, and one supervised that leverages parallel data with a new cross-lingual language model objective. We obtain state-of-the-art results on cross-lingual classification, unsupervised and supervised machine translation. On XNLI, our approach pushes the state of the art by an absolute gain of 4.9% accuracy. On unsupervised machine translation, we obtain 34.3 BLEU on WMT'16 German-English, improving the previous state of the art by more than 9 BLEU. On supervised machine translation, we obtain a new state of the art of 38.5 BLEU on WMT'16 Romanian-English, outperforming the previous best approach by more than 4 BLEU. Our code and pretrained models will be made publicly available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1901.07291

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using a denoising objective always results in better downstream task performance compared to a language modeling objective.

    “Finally, we confirm the widely-held conception that using a denoising objective always results in better downstream task performance compared to a language modeling objective.”

    From Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer (2019) · cites this paper as Lample and Conneau, 2019

    Section 5.3 (pp. 6–7) reports that masked language modeling (MLM) pretraining outperformed causal language modeling (CLM) pretraining in the machine-translation comparisons studied. It does not establish that a denoising objective always yields better performance across downstream tasks; the paper also distinguishes MLM pretraining from the denoising auto-encoding loss used during translation training. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Waleed Ammar, George Mulcaire, Yulia Tsvetkov, Guillaume Lample, Chris Dyer, and Noah A Smith. 2016. Massively multilingual word embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.01925 . · arXiv
  2. Kunchukuttan Anoop, Mehta Pratik, and Bhattacharyya Pushpak. 2018. The iit bombay englishhindi parallel corpus. In LREC .
  3. Mikel Artetxe, Gorka Labaka, Eneko Agirre, and Kyunghyun Cho. 2018. Unsupervised neural machine translation. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) .
  4. Mikel Artetxe and Holger Schwenk. 2018. Massively multilingual sentence embeddings for zeroshot cross-lingual transfer and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.10464 . · arXiv
  5. Samuel R. Bowman, Gabor Angeli, Christopher Potts, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015. A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference. In EMNLP .
  6. Jose Camacho-Collados, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, Nigel Collier, and Roberto Navigli. 2017. Semeval2017 task 2: Multilingual and cross-lingual semantic word similarity. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval2017) , pages 15-26.
  7. Pi-Chuan Chang, Michel Galley, and Christopher D Manning. 2008. Optimizing chinese word segmentation for machine translation performance. In Proceedings of the third workshop on statistical machine translation , pages 224-232.
  8. Alexis Conneau and Douwe Kiela. 2018. Senteval: An evaluation toolkit for universal sentence representations. LREC .
  9. Alexis Conneau, Guillaume Lample, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Ludovic Denoyer, and Herv Jegou. 2018a. Word translation without parallel data. In ICLR .
  10. Alexis Conneau, Ruty Rinott, Guillaume Lample, Adina Williams, Samuel R. Bowman, Holger Schwenk, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2018b. Xnli: Evaluating cross-lingual sentence representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing . Association for Computational Linguistics.
  11. Akiko Eriguchi, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat, Hideto Kazawa, and Wolfgang Macherey. 2018. Zeroshot cross-lingual classification using multilingual neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.04686 . · arXiv
  12. Dan Hendrycks and Kevin Gimpel. 2016. Bridging nonlinearities and stochastic regularizers with gaussian error linear units. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415 . · arXiv
  13. Karl Moritz Hermann and Phil Blunsom. 2014. Multilingual models for compositional distributed semantics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.4641 . · arXiv
  14. Jeremy Howard and Sebastian Ruder. 2018. Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , volume 1, pages 328-339.
  15. Melvin Johnson, Mike Schuster, Quoc V Le, Maxim Krikun, Yonghui Wu, Zhifeng Chen, Nikhil Thorat, Fernanda Vi´ egas, Martin Wattenberg, Greg Corrado, et al. 2017. Googles multilingual neural machine translation system: Enabling zero-shot translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 5:339-351.
  16. Rafal Jozefowicz, Oriol Vinyals, Mike Schuster, Noam Shazeer, and Yonghui Wu. 2016. Exploring the limits of language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02410 . · arXiv
  17. Guillaume Lample, Alexis Conneau, Ludovic Denoyer, and Marc'Aurelio Ranzato. 2018a. Unsupervised machine translation using monolingual corpora only. In ICLR .
  18. Guillaume Lample, Myle Ott, Alexis Conneau, Ludovic Denoyer, and Marc'Aurelio Ranzato. 2018b. Phrase-based & neural unsupervised machine translation. In EMNLP .
  19. Tom´ aˇ s Mikolov, Martin Karafi´ at, Luk´ aˇ s Burget, Jan ˇ Cernock` y, and Sanjeev Khudanpur. 2010. Recurrent neural network based language model. In Eleventh Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association .
  20. Tomas Mikolov, Quoc V Le, and Ilya Sutskever. 2013a. Exploiting similarities among languages for machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.4168 . · arXiv
  21. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013b. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 3111-3119.
  22. Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Soumith Chintala, Gregory Chanan, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Zeming Lin, Alban Desmaison, Luca Antiga, and Adam Lerer. 2017. Automatic differentiation in pytorch. NIPS 2017 Autodiff Workshop .
  23. Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. 2015. Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 1715-1725.
  24. Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. 2016. Edinburgh neural machine translation systems for wmt 16. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02891 . · arXiv
  25. Samuel L Smith, David HP Turban, Steven Hamblin, and Nils Y Hammerla. 2017. Offline bilingual word vectors, orthogonal transformations and the inverted softmax. International Conference on Learning Representations .
  26. Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D Manning, Andrew Ng, and Christopher Potts. 2013. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages 1631-1642.
  27. Wilson L Taylor. 1953. cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Bulletin , 30(4):415-433.
  28. Jrg Tiedemann. 2012. Parallel data, tools and interfaces in opus. In LREC , Istanbul, Turkey. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
  29. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 6000-6010.
  30. Takashi Wada and Tomoharu Iwata. 2018. Unsupervised cross-lingual word embedding by multilingual neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02306 . · arXiv
  31. Alex Wang, Amapreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R Bowman. 2018. Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07461 . · arXiv
  32. Paul J Werbos. 1990. Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it. Proceedings of the IEEE , 78(10):1550-1560.
  33. Adina Williams, Nikita Nangia, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2017. A broad-coverage challenge corpus for sentence understanding through inference. In NAACL .
  34. Chao Xing, Dong Wang, Chao Liu, and Yiye Lin. 2015. Normalized word embedding and orthogonal transform for bilingual word translation. Proceedings of NAACL .
  35. Michal Ziemski, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt, and Bruno Pouliquen. 2016. The united nations parallel corpus v1. 0. In LREC .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lample, G., & Conneau, A.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1901.07291
arXiv
1901.07291
OpenAlex
W2914120296
Cited by
1,586
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 301 · 2022: 298 · 2021: 414 · 2020: 304 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
cross-lingual language models, multilingual natural language understanding, unsupervised pre-training, parallel data, cross-lingual classification, machine translation, XNLI, multilingual pretrained models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review