Cited by 1,879Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Conceptual Captions: A Cleaned, Hypernymed, Image Alt-text Dataset For Automatic Image Captioning

Open access
Sharma, Piyush, Ding, Nan, Goodman, Sebastian, Soricut, Radu·2018·Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

We present a new dataset of image caption annotations, Conceptual Captions, which contains an order of magnitude more images than the MS-COCO dataset (Lin et al., 2014) and represents a wider variety of both images and image caption styles.We achieve this by extracting and filtering image caption annotations from billions of webpages.We also present quantitative evaluations of a number of image captioning models and show that a model architecture based on Inception-ResNet-v2 (Szegedy et al., 2016) for image-feature extraction and Transformer (Vaswani et al., 2017) for sequence modeling achieves the best performance when trained on the Conceptual Captions dataset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/p18-1238

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several ideas introduced recently include random sampling, learning concept dictionary, uniform masking, patch projection, joint learning of a region detector, and representation aligning before mask prediction.

    “Several ideas introduced recently include random sampling [113], learning concept dictionary [203], uniform masking [270], patch projection [192], joint learning of a region detector [271], and representation aligning before mask prediction [263].”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [203]

  • Recent remedies for fine-grained semantic alignment include random sampling, learning a concept dictionary, jointly learning a region detector, and representation aligning before mask prediction.

    “Several remedies introduced recently include random sampling [113], learning concept dictionary [203], jointly learning a region detector [271], and representation aligning before mask prediction [263].”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [203]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Craig Chambers, Ashish Raniwala, Frances Perry, Stephen Adams, Robert Henry, Robert Bradshaw, and Nathan. 2010. Flumejava: Easy, effi- cient data-parallel pipelines. In ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI). 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701 New York, NY 10121-0701, pages 363-375. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1806638.
  2. Oriol Vinyals, Alexander Toshev, Samy Bengio, and Dumitru Erhan. 2015a. Show and tell: A neural im- age caption generator. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion. pages 3156-3164.
  3. Z. Yang, Y. Yuan, Y. Wu, R. Salakhutdinov, and W. W. Cohen. 2016. Review networks for caption genera- tion. In NIPS.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, P., Ding, N., Goodman, S., & Soricut, R.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2018
Pages
2556-2565
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886641317
Cited by
1,879
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 143 · 2025: 298 · 2024: 369 · 2023: 390 · 2022: 255 · 2021: 250 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 1
FWCI
31.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
image captioning, InceptionResNetV2, transformer models, image feature extraction, sequence modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review