Cited by 287Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization3D Shape Modeling and Analysis3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Co-SLAM: Joint Coordinate and Sparse Parametric Encodings for Neural Real-Time SLAM

Open access
Wang, Hengyi, Wang, Jingwen, Agapito, Lourdes·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

We present Co-SLAM, a neural RGB-D SLAM system based on a hybrid representation, that performs robust camera tracking and high-fidelity surface reconstruction in real time. Co-SLAM represents the scene as a multi-resolution hash-grid to exploit its high convergence speed and ability to represent high-frequency local features. In addition, Co-SLAM incorporates one-blob encoding, to encourage surface coherence and completion in unobserved areas. This joint parametric-coordinate encoding enables real-time and robust performance by bringing the best of both worlds: fast convergence and surface hole filling. Moreover, our ray sampling strategy allows Co-SLAM to perform global bundle adjustment over all keyframes instead of requiring keyframe selection to maintain a small number of active keyframes as competing neural SLAM approaches do. Experimental results show that Co-SLAM runs at 10-17Hz and achieves state-of-the-art scene reconstruction results, and competitive tracking performance in various datasets and benchmarks (ScanNet, TUM, Replica, Synthetic RGBD). Project page: https://hengyiwang.github.io/projects/CoSLAM

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01277

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DeeR-VLA optimizes reasoning with dynamic early-exit mechanism to reduce computational overhead.

    “Efficient alignment of multimodal features is critical, with OpenVLA [19] using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for parameter-efficient fusion, while DeeR-VLA [155] optimizes reasoning with a dynamic early-exit mechanism to reduce computational overhead.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, H., Wang, J., & Agapito, L.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
13293-13302
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386066696
Cited by
287
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 6
FWCI
151.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Cisco Systems
  • UK Research and Innovation (EP/S021566/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T022205/1, EP/S021566/1, T022205/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
RGB-D SLAM, camera tracking, surface reconstruction, ray sampling, bundle adjustment, real-time SLAM, keyframe selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review