Cited by 1,791Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoders

Open access
Woo, Sanghyun, Debnath, Shoubhik, Hu, Ronghang, Chen, Xinlei, Liu, Zhuang, Kweon, In So, Xie, Saining·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Driven by improved architectures and better representation learning frameworks, the field of visual recognition has enjoyed rapid modernization and performance boost in the early 2020s. For example, modern ConvNets, represented by ConvNeXt [33], have demonstrated strong performance in various scenarios. While these models were originally designed for supervised learning with ImageNet labels, they can also potentially benefit from self-supervised learning techniques such as masked autoencoders (MAE) [14]. However, we found that simply combining these two approaches leads to subpar performance. In this paper, we propose a fully convolutional masked autoencoder framework and a new Global Response Normalization (GRN) layer that can be added to the ConvNeXt architecture to enhance inter-channel feature competition. This co-design of self-supervised learning techniques and architectural improvement results in a new model family called ConvNeXt V2, which significantly improves the performance of pure ConvNets on various recognition benchmarks, including ImageNet classification, COCO detection, and ADE20K segmentation. We also provide pre-trained ConvNeXt V2 models of various sizes, ranging from an efficient 3.7M-parameter Atto model with 76.7% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, to a 650M Huge model that achieves a state-of-the-art 88.9% accuracy using only public training data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01548

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Masked autoencoding can be combined with convolutional encoders, while requiring attention to the interaction between masking and convolutional architectures.

    “Related developments in computer vision, such as ConvNeXt V2 and VideoMAC, also show that masked autoencoding can be combined with convolutional encoders, while requiring attention to the interaction between masking and convolutional architectures43,44.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woo, S., Debnath, S., Hu, R., Chen, X., Liu, Z., Kweon, I. S., & Xie, S.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Meta AI, FAIR
  • New York University (US)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
16133-16142
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386076493
Cited by
1,791
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 577 · 2025: 692 · 2024: 418 · 2023: 104
FWCI
191.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
ConvNeXt V2, masked autoencoder, self-supervised learning, convolutional neural networks, image classification, object detection, semantic segmentation, pre-trained models, model scaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review