Cited by 444Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Learning by Tracking: Siamese CNN for Robust Target Association

Open access
Leal-Taixe, Laura, Canton-Ferrer, Cristian, Schindler, Konrad·2016·2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel approach to the task of data association within the context of pedestrian tracking, by introducing a two-stage learning scheme to match pairs of detections. First, a Siamese convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained to learn descriptors encoding local spatio-temporal structures between the two input image patches, aggregating pixel values and optical flow information. Second, a set of contextual features derived from the position and size of the compared input patches are combined with the CNN output by means of a gradient boosting classifier to generate the final matching probability. This learning approach is validated by using a linear programming based multi-person tracker showing that even a simple and efficient tracker may outperform much more complex models when fed with our learned matching probabilities. Results on publicly available sequences show that our method meets state-of-the-art standards in multiple people tracking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw.2016.59

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. S. Chopra, R. Hadsell, and Y. LeCun. Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. CVPR, 2005. 3
  2. Z. Khan, T. Balch, and F. Dellaert. Mcmc-based particle filtering for tracking a variable number of interacting targets. TPAMI, 2005. 2
  3. L. Leal-Taixé, G. Pons-Moll, and B. Rosenhahn. Branch-and-price global optimization for multi-view multi-object tracking. CVPR, 2012. 2
  4. H. Li, Y. Li, and F. Porikli. Deeptrack: Learning discriminative fea- ture representations online for robust visual tracking. ArXiv e-prints, 2015. 2
  5. P. M. N. McLaughlin, J. Martinez Del Rincon. Enhancing linear pro- gramming with motion modeling for multi-target tracking. WACV. 7
  6. S. Wang and C. Fowlkes. Learning optimal parameters for multi- target tracking. BMVC, 2015. 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leal-Taixe, L., Canton-Ferrer, C., & Schindler, K.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-06
Pages
418-425
OpenAlex
W2345229200
Cited by
444
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 23
FWCI
15.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
pedestrian tracking, data association, Siamese convolutional neural network, target association, optical flow, spatio-temporal features, gradient boosting classifier, multi-person tracking, match probability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review