Cited by 4,036Face and Expression RecognitionFace recognition and analysisBiometric Identification and Security

Learning a Similarity Metric Discriminatively, with Application to Face Verification

Open access
Chopra, S., Hadsell, R., LeCun, Y.·2005·2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05)

Abstract

We present a method for training a similarity metric from data. The method can be used for recognition or verification applications where the number of categories is very large and not known during training, and where the number of training samples for a single category is very small. The idea is to learn a function that maps input patterns into a target space such that the L/sub 1/ norm in the target space approximates the "semantic" distance in the input space. The method is applied to a face verification task. The learning process minimizes a discriminative loss function that drives the similarity metric to be small for pairs of faces from the same person, and large for pairs from different persons. The mapping from raw to the target space is a convolutional network whose architecture is designed for robustness to geometric distortions. The system is tested on the Purdue/AR face database which has a very high degree of variability in the pose, lighting, expression, position, and artificial occlusions such as dark glasses and obscuring scarves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2005.202

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous methods have been proposed to detect deepfakes.

    “Thus far, there have been numerous methods proposed to detect deepfakes [25–29].”

    From Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey (2022) · cites this paper as [26]

  • 1D CNN can be applied to signal identification such as ECG signal identification, structural damage identification, and system fault identification.

    “It can be applied to ECG signal identification, structural damage identification, and system fault identification.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chopra, S., Hadsell, R., & LeCun, Y.
Affiliations
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US)
Venue
2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005-07-27
Volume
1
Pages
539-546
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157364932
Cited by
4,036
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 256 · 2024: 327 · 2023: 489 · 2022: 490 · 2021: 525 · 2020: 475 · 2019: 451 · 2018: 320 · 2017: 230 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
11.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
similarity metric learning, face verification, L1 norm, semantic distance, convolutional neural networks, geometric distortion robustness, small sample size, face recognition, AR face database

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review