The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional Networks
Open accessAbstract
The discriminative power of modern deep learning models for 3D human action recognition is growing ever so potent. In conjunction with the recent resurgence of 3D human action representation with 3D skeletons, the quality and the pace of recent progress have been significant. However, the inner workings of state-of-the-art learning based methods in 3D human action recognition still remain mostly black-box. In this work, we propose to use a new class of models known as Temporal Convolutional Neural Networks (TCN) for 3D human action recognition. TCN provides us a way to explicitly learn readily interpretable spatio-temporal representations for 3D human action recognition. Through this work, we wish to take a step towards a spatio-temporal model that is easier to understand, explain and interpret. The resulting model, Res-TCN, achieves state-of-the-art results on the largest 3D human action recognition dataset, NTU-RGBD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation
Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2644615 · Cited by 19,631
Identity mappings in deep residual networks
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38 · Cited by 10,741
Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3236386.3241340 · Cited by 5,427
Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034 · Cited by 5,370
Temporal Convolutional Networks for Action Segmentation and Detection
Lea, C., Flynn, M. D., Vidal, R., Reiter, A., & Hager, G. D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.113 · Cited by 2,238 · cited 4×
“A D-dimensional feature vector, whether it is a deep feature from a spatial CNN such as fc7 activation of AlexNet [19] or a set of kinematic features [20], is extracted per each video frame.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationUnderstanding deep image representations by inverting them
Mahendran, A., & Vedaldi, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299155 · Cited by 1,827
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- zhu, 2016, Co-occurrence feature learning for skeleton based action recognition using regularized deep LSTM networks, Proc of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 3697
- tibshirani, 2011, Prototype selection for interpretable classification, The Annals of Applied Statistics, 5, 2403, 10.1214/11-AOAS495 · DOI
- srivastava, 2014, Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting, J Mach Learn Res, 15, 1929
- song, 2017, An end-to-end spatio-temporal attention model for human action recognition from skeleton data, Proc of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 4263
- simonyan, 2014, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-scale Image Recognition, abs 1409 1556
- 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126474 · DOI · Paper page
- zeiler, 2014, Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks, 818
- 10.1016/j.cviu.2010.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TCSVT.2008.2005594 · DOI · Paper page
- han, 2013, Enhanced computer vision with microsoft kinect sensor: A review, IEEE Trans CYBERNETICS, 43
- herath, 2016, Going deeper into action recognition A survey, abs 1605 4988
- hochreiter, 2001, Gradient Flow in Recurrent Nets The Difficulty of Learning Long-term Dependencies
- 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299172 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03212378 · DOI · Paper page
- kim, 2016, Examples are not enough, learn to criticize! criticism for interpretability, Advances in Neural IInformation Processing Systems, 2280
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.115 · DOI · Paper page
- chollet, 2015, Keras
- 10.1016/j.cviu.2016.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
- du, 2015, Hierarchical recurrent neural network for skeleton based action recognition, The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.522 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.06.042 · DOI · Paper page
- erhan, 2009, Visualizing Higher-layer Features of Deep Networks, 1341
- 10.1016/j.patrec.2014.04.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cviu.2017.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
- abadi, 2015, Tensor-Flow Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems
- lipton, 2016, The mythos of model interpretability, ICML WHI 2016, abs 1606 3490
- liu, 2016, Spatio-Temporal LSTM with Trust Gates for 3D Human Action Recognition, 816
- 10.1145/2939672.2939778 · DOI · Paper page
- pascanu, 2013, On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks, Proceedings of the 30th international conference on international conference on Machine Learning - Volume 28 ICML'13, iii-1310
Cited by
Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition
Yan, S., Xiong, Y., & Lin, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12328 · Cited by 5,410
Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges
Ahmed, S. F., Alam, M. S. B., Hassan, M., Rozbu, M. R., Ishtiak, T., Rafa, N., Mofijur, M., Shawkat Ali, A. B. M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8 · Cited by 1,079
Independently Recurrent Neural Network (IndRNN): Building A Longer and Deeper RNN
Li, S., Li, W., Cook, C., Zhu, C., & Gao, Y. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00572 · Cited by 972
Decoupling GCN with DropGraph Module for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition
Cheng, K., Zhang, Y., Cao, C., Shi, L., Cheng, J., & Lu, H. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58586-0_32 · Cited by 384
Betthauser, J. L., Krall, J. T., Bannowsky, S. G., Levay, G., Kaliki, R. R., Fifer, M. S., & Thakor, N. V. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2019.2943309 · Cited by 73
Learning Multi-View Interactional Skeleton Graph for Action Recognition
Wang, M., Ni, B., & Yang, X. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3032738 · Cited by 67
SkeletonMAE: Spatial-Temporal Masked Autoencoders for Self-Supervised Skeleton Action Recognition
Wu, W., Hua, Y., Zheng, C., Wu, S., Chen, C., & Lu, A. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW) · doi:10.1109/icmew59549.2023.00045 · Cited by 60
Bednarski, B. P., Singh, A. D., Zhang, W., Jones, W. M., Naeim, A., & Ramezani, R. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-25472-z · Cited by 41
“Additionally, a residual block connection has been added between every other layer to prevent overfitting 22 .”
BackgroundMethod for detection of unsafe actions in power field based on edge computing architecture
Yin, Y., Lin, J., Sun, N., Zhu, Q., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., & Liu, M. (2021) · Journal of Cloud Computing · doi:10.1186/s13677-021-00234-w · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, T. S., & Reiter, A.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Pages
- 1623-1631
- OpenAlex
- W2613570903
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 17.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
