Cited by 107Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Visual SLAM for Automated Driving: Exploring the Applications of Deep Learning

Milz, Stefan, Arbeiter, Georg, Witt, Christian, Abdallah, Bassam, Yogamani, Senthil·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Deep learning has become the standard model for object detection and recognition. Recently, there is progress on using CNN models for geometric vision tasks like depth estimation, optical flow prediction or motion segmentation. However, Visual SLAM remains to be one of the areas of automated driving where CNNs are not mature for deployment in commercial automated driving systems. In this paper, we explore how deep learning can be used to replace parts of the classical Visual SLAM pipeline. Firstly, we describe the building blocks of Visual SLAM pipeline composed of standard geometric vision tasks. Then we provide an overview of Visual SLAM use cases for automated driving based on the authors' experience in commercial deployment. Finally, we discuss the opportunities of using Deep Learning to improve upon state-of-the-art classical methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw.2018.00062

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bojarski et al. demonstrated end-to-end learning for steering [2] and recently it was applied to fisheye cameras [54].

    “Bojarski et al. demonstrated end-to-end learning [2] for steering and recently it was applied to fisheye cameras [54].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milz, S., Arbeiter, G., Witt, C., Abdallah, B., & Yogamani, S.
Affiliations
  • Valeo (Germany) (DE)
  • Valeo (Ireland) (IE)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
360-36010
OpenAlex
W2897475915
Cited by
107
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14
FWCI
20.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
visual SLAM, autonomous driving, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, depth estimation, optical flow prediction, motion segmentation, commercial deployment, object detection and recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review