Cited by 304Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Complexer-YOLO: Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Tracking on Semantic Point Clouds

Open access
Simon, Martin, Amende, Karl, Kraus, Andrea, Honer, Jens, Samann, Timo, Kaulbersch, Hauke, Milz, Stefan, Gross, Horst Michael·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Accurate detection of 3D objects is a fundamental problem in computer vision and has an enormous impact on autonomous cars, augmented/virtual reality and many applications in robotics. In this work we present a novel fusion of neural network based state-of-the-art 3D detector and visual semantic segmentation in the context of autonomous driving. Additionally, we introduce Scale-Rotation-Translation score (SRTs), a fast and highly parameterizable evaluation metric for comparison of object detections, which speeds up our inference time up to 20% and halves training time. On top, we apply state-of-the-art online multi target feature tracking on the object measurements to further increase accuracy and robustness utilizing temporal information. Our experiments on KITTI show that we achieve same results as state-of-the-art in all related categories, while maintaining the performance and accuracy trade-off and still run in real-time. Furthermore, our model is the first one that fuses visual semantic with 3D object detection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw.2019.00158

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental results show that using depth information, optical flow information, and LiDAR point clouds in addition to conventional RGB data can improve the performance of one-stage based detection systems.

    “According to experimental results, it has been shown that the use of depth information [183, 184], optical flow information [185], and LiDAR point clouds [186] in addition to conventional RGB data can improve the performance of one-stage based detection systems.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollar, and R. Girshick. Mask R- CNN. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2017. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, M., Amende, K., Kraus, A., Honer, J., Samann, T., Kaulbersch, H., Milz, S., & Gross, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Valeo (Germany) (DE)
  • Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
1190-1199
OpenAlex
W2940208651
Cited by
304
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
3D object detection, semantic point clouds, YOLO, autonomous driving, multi-target tracking, evaluation metrics, real-time detection, KITTI dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review