Cited by 33Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

When a Few Clicks Make All the Difference: Improving Weakly-Supervised Wildlife Detection in UAV Images

Open access
Kellenberger, Benjamin, Marcos, Diego, Tuia, Devis·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Automated object detectors on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly employed for a wide range of tasks. However, to be accurate in their specific task they need expensive ground truth in the form of bounding boxes or positional information. Weakly-Supervised Object Detection (WSOD) overcomes this hindrance by localizing objects with only image-level labels that are faster and cheaper to obtain, but is not on par with fully-supervised models in terms of performance. In this study we propose to combine both approaches in a model that is principally apt for WSOD, but receives full position ground truth for a small number of images. Experiments show that with just 1% of densely annotated images, but simple image-level counts as remaining ground truth, we effectively match the performance of fully-supervised models on a challenging dataset with scarcely occurring wildlife on UAV images from the African savanna. As a result, with a very limited amount of precise annotations our model can be trained with ground truth that is orders of magnitude cheaper and faster to obtain while still providing the same detection performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw.2019.00182

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large mammal detection in the Kuzikus reserve in 2014 was improved from a recall rate of 20% to 80% for a common 75% precision rate.

    “large mammal detection in the Kuzikus reserve in 2014 was improved significantly by improving the detection methodologies, from a recall rate of 20%35 to 80%37 (for a common 75% precision rate).”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Amy Bearman, Olga Russakovsky, Vittorio Ferrari, and Li Fei-Fei. Whats the point: Semantic segmentation with point supervision. In ECCV, pages 549-565. Springer, 2016.
  2. Elizabeth Bondi, Debadeepta Dey, Ashish Kapoor, Jim Pi- avis, Shital Shah, Fei Fang, Bistra Dilkina, Robert Han- naford, Arvind Iyer, Lucas Joppa, and Milind Tambe. Airsim-w: A simulation environment for wildlife conserva- tion with uavs. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS). ACM, 2018.
  3. Ross Girshick. Fast r-cnn. In ICCV, pages 1440-1448, 2015.
  4. Kaiming He and Ross Girshick. Mask R-CNN. In ICCV, pages 2961-2969, 2017.
  5. Dim P. Papadopoulos, Jasper RR Uijlings, Frank Keller, and Vittorio Ferrari. We don't need no bounding-boxes: Train- ing object class detectors using only human verification. In CVPR, pages 854-863, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kellenberger, B., Marcos, D., & Tuia, D.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
1414-1422
OpenAlex
W2953098847
Cited by
33
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
weakly supervised object detection, wildlife detection, unmanned aerial vehicles, UAV imagery, image-level labels, bounding box annotation, annotation cost reduction, African savanna

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review