Cited by 150Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsSmart Agriculture and AI

Detecting animals in African Savanna with UAVs and the crowds

Open access
Rey, Nicolas, Volpi, Michele, Joost, Stéphane, Tuia, Devis·2017·Remote Sensing of Environment

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offer new opportunities for wildlife monitoring, with several advantages over traditional field-based methods. They have readily been used to count birds, marine mammals and large herbivores in different environments, tasks which are routinely performed through manual counting in large collections of images. In this paper, we propose a semi-automatic system able to detect large mammals in semi-arid Savanna. It relies on an animal-detection system based on machine learning, trained with crowd-sourced annotations provided by volunteers who manually interpreted sub-decimeter resolution color images. The system achieves a high recall rate and a human operator can then eliminate false detections with limited effort. Our system provides good perspectives for the development of data-driven management practices in wildlife conservation. It shows that the detection of large mammals in semi-arid Savanna can be approached by processing data provided by standard RGB cameras mounted on affordable fixed wings UAVs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.026

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large mammal detection in the Kuzikus reserve in 2014 was improved from a recall rate of 20% to 80% for a common 75% precision rate.

    “large mammal detection in the Kuzikus reserve in 2014 was improved significantly by improving the detection methodologies, from a recall rate of 20%35 to 80%37 (for a common 75% precision rate).”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rey, N., Volpi, M., Joost, S., & Tuia, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Tuia, Devis
Venue
Remote Sensing of Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
200
Pages
341-351
ISSN
0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2752508182
Cited by
150
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Remote Sensing of Environment (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (PZ00P2-136827, http://p3.snf.ch/project-136827)
  • Consortium for Ocean Leadership
  • Wildlife Reserves Singapore Conservation Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
animal detection, large mammals, African savanna, unmanned aerial vehicles, crowdsourced annotation, wildlife monitoring, semi-automatic detection, fixed-wing UAV, RGB images, wildlife conservation, semi-arid savanna

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review