Cited by 23Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesQuantum Information and Cryptography

Codar: A Contextual Duration-Aware Qubit Mapping for Various NISQ Devices

Open access
Deng, Haowei, Zhang, Yu, Li, Quanxi·2020·2020 57th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)

Abstract

Quantum computing devices in the NISQ era share common features and challenges like limited connectivity between qubits. Since two-qubit gates are allowed on limited qubit pairs, quantum compilers must transform original quantum programs to fit the hardware constraints. Previous works on qubit mapping assume different gates have the same execution duration, which limits them to explore the parallelism from the program. To address this drawback, we propose a Multi-architecture Adaptive Quantum Abstract Machine (maQAM) and a COntext-sensitive and Duration-Aware Remapping algorithm (Codar). The Codar remapper is aware of gate duration difference and program context, enabling it to extract more parallelism from programs and speed up the quantum programs by 1.23 in simulation on average in different architectures and maintain the fidelity of circuits when running on OriginQ quantum noisy simulator.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/dac18072.2020.9218561

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2][2] Ali Javadi Abhari, Shruti Patil, Daniel Kudrow, Jeff Heckey, Alexey Lvov, Frederic T. Chong, and Margaret Martonosi. ScaffCC: A framework for compilation and analysis of quantum computing programs. In 11th CF , pages 1:1-1:10, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. -
  2. [4][4] Abdullah Ash-Saki, Mahabubul Alam, and Swaroop Ghosh. QURE: Qubit reallocation in noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers. In 56th DAC , pages 141:1-6, 2019. -
  3. [13][13] Alexander S. Green, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine, Neil J. Ross, Peter Selinger, and Benoˆ ıt Valiron. Quipper: a scalable quantum programming language. In 34th PLDI , pages 333-342. ACM, 2013. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, H., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
2020 57th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-07
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0738-100X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008133439
Cited by
23
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
qubit mapping, quantum circuit compilation, NISQ devices, parallelism extraction, maqam, CODAR, circuit fidelity, noisy quantum simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review