CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 310Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Open Quantum Assembly Language

Open access
Cross, Andrew W., Bishop, Lev S., Smolin, John A., Gambetta, Jay M.·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1707.03429arXiv 1707.03429
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This document describes a quantum assembly language (QASM) called OpenQASM that is used to implement experiments with low depth quantum circuits. OpenQASM represents universal physical circuits over the CNOT plus SU(2) basis with straight-line code that includes measurement, reset, fast feedback, and gate subroutines. The simple text language can be written by hand or by higher level tools and may be executed on the IBM Q Experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1707.03429

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1][1] P. Selinger. A brief survey of quantum programming languages. Proc. Seventh Int'l Symp. Functional and Logic Programming , pages 1-6, 2004. -
  2. [3][3] K. Svore, A. Cross, A. Aho, I. Chuang, and I. Markov. A layered software architecture for quantum computing design tools. IEEE Computer , (39(1)):74-83, 2006. -
  3. [4][4] T. H¨ aner, D. Steiger, K. Svore, and M. Troyer. A software methodology for compiling quantum programs. arxiv:1604.01401 , 2016. - · arXiv
  4. [5][5] D. Wecker and K. Svore. LIQ Ui |〉 : A software design architecture and domain-specific language for quantum computing. arXiv:1402.4467 , 2014. - · arXiv
  5. [7][7] A. JavadiAbhari, S. Patil, D. Kudrow, J. Heckey, A. Lvov, F. Chong, and M. Martonosi. ScaffCC: a framework for compilation and analysis of quantum computing programs. ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers (CF 2014) , 2014. -
  6. [9][9] B. Valiron, N. Ross, P. Selinger, D. Scott Alexander, and J. Smith. Programming the quantum future. Communications of the ACM , 58(8):52-61, 2015. -
  7. [11][11] A. S. Green, P. LeFanu Lumsdaine, N. J. Ross, P. Selinger, and B. Valiron. Quipper: a scalable quantum programming language. ACM SIGPLAN Notices , (48(6)):333-342, 2013. -
  8. [12][12] M. Troyer D. S. Steiger, T. H¨ aner. ProjectQ: An open source software framework for quantum computing. arXiv:1612.08091 , 2016. - · arXiv
  9. [14][14] B. Omer. Structured quantum programming. Vienna University of Technology, Ph. D. thesis , 2003. -
  10. [17][17] G. F. Viamontes, I. L. Markov, and J. P. Hayes. Graph-based simulation of quantum computation in the density matrix representation. Quant. Inf. Comp. , 5(2):113-130, 2005. -
  11. [18][18] X. Liu and J. Kubiatowicz. Chisel-Q: designing quantum circuits with a Scala embedded language. IEEE 31st International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) , 2013. -
  12. [21][21] R. Smith, M. Curtis, and W. Zeng. A practical quantum instruction set architecture. arXiv:1608.03355 , 2016. - · arXiv
  13. [25][25] S. Balensiefer, L. Kreger-Stickles, and M. Oskin. QUALE: quantum architecture layout evaluator. Proc. SPIE 5815, Quantum information and computation III , (103), 2005. -
  14. [28][28] N. D. Mermin. Quantum Computer Science . Cambridge, 2007. -
  15. [29][29] S. Cuccaro, T. Draper, S. Kutin, and D. Moulton. A new quantum ripple-carry addition circuit. arXiv:quant-ph/0410184 , 2004. - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cross, A. W., Bishop, L. S., Smolin, J. A., & Gambetta, J. M.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1707.03429
arXiv
1707.03429
OpenAlex
W2734474749
Cited by
310
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
OpenQASM, CNOT gate, quantum measurement, fast feedback, low-depth quantum circuits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review