Cited by 13Advanced Fiber Optic SensorsAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Optical fiber sensors for monitoring in critical care

Morgan, S. P., Canfarotta, F., Piletska, E.V., Grillo, F., Korposh, S., Liu, L., Hernandez, F.U., Correia, R. +4 more·2019·2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)

Abstract

Monitoring of key physiological and pharmacological parameters is an important part of a closed loop control system in critical care. Optical fiber sensors provide a versatile platform technology that can be easily incorporated into existing in-dwelling catheters or face masks. With appropriate functional coatings they can be used to monitor a range of relevant parameters and two different examples are presented: (i) respiration monitoring; (ii) drug level monitoring. Respiration monitoring involves monitoring of temperature and humidity in inhaled and exhaled breath. The optical fiber sensor consists of a fiber Bragg grating to measure temperature and a tip coating whose refractive index changes with humidity. The sensor is demonstrated to be able to track breath to breath changes when incorporated into a mask. Drug level monitoring is demonstrated in vitro using a long period grating coated with molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles that are sensitive to fentanyl. The sensor has a limit of detection of 50ng/ml.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/embc.2019.8856893

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A long-term grating coated with molecularly imprinted fentanyl-sensitive polymer nanoparticles demonstrated in vitro drug level monitoring with a detection limit of 50 ng/mL.

    “In vitro, drug level monitoring has also been demonstrated using a long-term grating coated with molecularly imprinted fentanyl-sensitive polymer nanoparticles (detection limit 50 ng/mL) [265].”

    From The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables (2022) · cites this paper as [265]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, S. P., Canfarotta, F., Piletska, E. V., Grillo, F., Korposh, S., Liu, L., Hernandez, F. U., Correia, R., Norris, A., Sinha, R., Hayes-Gill, B. R., & Piletsky, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Venue
2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-07
Volume
2019
Pages
1139-1143
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979704247
Cited by
13
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N026985/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
fiber optic sensors, intensive care monitoring, feedback control, fiber Bragg grating, long-period fiber grating, respiratory monitoring, face masks, therapeutic drug monitoring, fentanyl detection, functional coatings
MeSH terms
Critical Care, Fiber Optic Technology, Humans, Humidity, Refractometry, Optical Fibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review