The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Grand challenges for engineering
Abstract
This publication contains reprint articles for which IEEE does not hold copyright. Full text is not available on IEEE Xplore for these articles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
3D Virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities
Dionisio, J. D. N., III, W. G. B., & Gilbert, R. (2013) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2480741.2480751 · Cited by 1,151
Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?
Cech, E. A. (2014) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243913504305 · Cited by 836
Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects
(2010) · INSIGHT · doi:10.1002/inst.20101338 · Cited by 816
Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8 · Cited by 455
Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences
Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Engineering Management Review
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-3
- ISSN
- 0360-8581 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-4178
- OpenAlex
- W2013940553
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 99.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grand challenges for engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/emr.2009.4804341
- The paper
- Ellis, G. (2009). Grand challenges for engineering. IEEE Engineering Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2009.4804341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
