The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards Fair and Robust Classification
Abstract
Robustness and fairness are two equally important issues for machine learning systems. Despite the active research on robustness and fairness of ML recently, these efforts focus on either fairness or robustness, but not both. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we design Fair and Robust Classification (FRoC) models that equip the classification models with both fairness and robustness. Meeting both fairness and robustness constraints is not trivial due to the tension between them. The trade-off between fairness, robustness, and model accuracy also introduces additional challenge. To address these challenges, we design two FRoC methods, namely FRoC-PRE that modifies the input data before model training, and FRoC-IN that modifies the model with an adversarial objective function to address both fairness and robustness during training. FRoC-IN is suitable to the settings where the users (e.g., ML service providers) only have the access to the model but not the original data, while FRoC-PRE works for the settings where the users (e.g., data owners) have the access to both data and a surrogate model that may have similar architecture as the target model. Our extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that both FRoC-IN and FRoC-PRE can achieve both fairness and robustness with insignificant accuracy loss of the target model.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integrating multi-level fairness techniques can achieve substantial improvements in fairness between groups with only minimal trade-offs in model accuracy.
“Other research similarly indicates that integrating multi-level fairness techniques can achieve substantial improvements in fairness between groups with only minimal trade-offs in model accuracy [14,15].”
From Advancing Health Equity through Multi-Level Fairness in Health Informatics (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination
Kamiran, F., & Calders, T. (2012) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-011-0463-8 · Cited by 1,305
The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism
Dressel, J., & Farid, H. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao5580 · Cited by 1,071
Shafahi, A., Najibi, M., Ghiasi, A., Xu, Z., Dickerson, J., Studer, C., Davis, L. S., Taylor, G., & Goldstein, T. (2019) · ETH Zurich · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000460345 · Cited by 580
Building Classifiers with Independency Constraints
Calders, T., Kamiran, F., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2009.83 · Cited by 468
Classifying without discriminating
Kamiran, F., & Calders, T. (2009) · 2009 2nd International Conference on Computer, Control and Communication · doi:10.1109/ic4.2009.4909197 · Cited by 409
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001 · DOI
- chen, 0, Robust decision trees against adversarial examples, International Conference on Machine Learning, 1122
- 10.1145/3319619.3326890 · DOI
- hunt, 2018, Chiron: Privacy-preserving machine learning as a service, ArXiv Preprint
- 10.1109/SP.2017.41 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICMLA.2015.152 · DOI
- denis, 2021, Fairness guarantee in multi-class classification, ArXiv Preprint
- li, 2018, Textbugger: Generating adversarial text against real-world applications, ArXiv Preprint
- 10.18653/v1/D18-1316 · DOI
- xu, 0, To be robust or to be fair: Towards fairness in adversarial training, International Conference on Machine Learning, 11492
- 10.1109/SP40000.2020.00073 · DOI
- chang, 2020, On adversarial bias and the robustness of fair machine learning, ArXiv Preprint
- quiring, 0, Misleading authorship attribution of source code using adversarial learning, 28th USENIX Security Symposium, 479
- hardt, 0, Equality of opportunity in supervised learning, Advances in neural information processing systems, 3315
- chouldechova, 2018, The frontiers of fairness in machine learning, ArXiv Preprint
- 10.1145/2090236.2090255 · DOI · Paper page
- steinhardt, 2017, Certified defenses for data poisoning attacks, ArXiv Preprint
- 10.1109/TIFS.2021.3080522 · DOI
- 10.1109/3477.740166 · DOI
- 10.1145/3340531.3411980 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.08.081 · DOI
- biggio, 2012, Poisoning attacks against support vector machines, ArXiv Preprint
- 0, Hospital discharge data use agreement
- larson, 0, Data and analysis for ‘machine bias’
- 10.1145/3394486.3403102 · DOI
- laishram, 2016, Curie: A method for protecting svm classifier from poisoning attack, ArXiv Preprint
- madry, 2017, Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks, ArXiv Preprint
- 10.1007/s10618-010-0190-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.24963/ijcai.2018/543 · DOI
- szegedy, 2013, Intriguing properties of neural networks, ArXiv Preprint
- goodfellow, 2014, Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples, ArXiv Preprint
- 10.1145/2783258.2783311 · DOI · Paper page
- kohavi, 0, Uci machine learning repository Adult data set
- 10.1109/ICDM.2015.84 · DOI
- koh, 0, Understanding black-box predictions via influence functions, International Conference on Machine Learning, 1885
- shaham, 2015, Understanding adversarial training: Increasing local stability of neural nets through robust optimization, ArXiv Preprint
- guo, 2017, Countering adversarial images using input transformations, ArXiv Preprint
- kurakin, 2016, Adversarial machine learning at scale, ArXiv Preprint
- 10.18653/v1/D17-1215 · DOI · Paper page
- mehrabi, 2019, A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning, ArXiv Preprint
- o'neil, 2016, Weapons of Math Destruction How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
- angwin, 2016, Machine bias there's software used across the country to predict future criminals and it's biased against blacks
- 10.1108/AA-02-2020-273 · DOI
- cook, 1982, Residuals and Influence in Regression
- chakraborty, 2018, Adversarial attacks and defences: A survey, ArXiv Preprint
- bechavod, 2017, Learning fair classifiers: a regularization-inspired approach, CoRR, abs 1707 44
- 10.6028/NIST.AI.100-2 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2807385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3038912.3052660 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2810103.2813677 · DOI · Paper page
- kamishima, 0, Fairness-aware classifier with prejudice remover regularizer, Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 35
- goh, 0, Satisfying real-world goals with dataset constraints, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2415
- 10.1109/TKDE.2013.57 · DOI
- sharma, 2020, Fair-n: Fair and robust neural networks for structured data, ArXiv Preprint
- carlini, 2019, On evaluating adversarial robustness, ArXiv Preprint
- fredrikson, 0, Privacy in pharmacogenetics: An end-to-end case study of personalized warfarin dosing, 23rd USENIX Security Symposium, 17
- gong, 0, You are who you know and how you behave: Attribute inference attacks via users' social friends and behaviors, 25th USENIX Security Symposium, 979
- 10.1504/IJSN.2015.071829 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advancing Health Equity through Multi-Level Fairness in Health Informatics
Souligne, N., & Subbian, V. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.16902
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, H., Wu, K., Wang, T., & Wang, W. H.
- Affiliations
- Meta (United States) (US)
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Stevens Institute of Technology,Hoboken,NJ
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE 7th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-06
- Pages
- 356-376
- OpenAlex
- W4283397204
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (NSF) (2029038,2135988,1951729,1953813,1953893)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- fair classification, robust classification, adversarial robustness, adversarial training, input perturbation, surrogate models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review