Cited by 2,021Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningDigital Media Forensic DetectionSecurity and Verification in Computing

Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Survey

Open access
Akhtar, Naveed, Mian, Ajmal·2018·IEEE Access

Abstract

Deep learning is at the heart of the current rise of artificial intelligence. In the field of computer vision, it has become the workhorse for applications ranging from self-driving cars to surveillance and security. Whereas, deep neural networks have demonstrated phenomenal success (often beyond human capabilities) in solving complex problems, recent studies show that they are vulnerable to adversarial attacks in the form of subtle perturbations to inputs that lead a model to predict incorrect outputs. For images, such perturbations are often too small to be perceptible, yet they completely fool the deep learning models. Adversarial attacks pose a serious threat to the success of deep learning in practice. This fact has recently led to a large influx of contributions in this direction. This paper presents the first comprehensive survey on adversarial attacks on deep learning in computer vision. We review the works that design adversarial attacks, analyze the existence of such attacks and propose defenses against them. To emphasize that adversarial attacks are possible in practical conditions, we separately review the contributions that evaluate adversarial attacks in the real-world scenarios. Finally, drawing on the reviewed literature, we provide a broader outlook of this research direction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2807385

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Image classification models have been particularly found to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, leading the image to be misclassified by the ML model.

    “Image classification models have been particularly found to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks [3] leading the image to be misclassified by the ML model.”
  • Mismatches in sensing have been widely studied in recent years within the deep learning field, for instance with adversarial attacks on computer vision algorithms.

    “The former aspect has been widely studied in recent years within the deep learning field, for instance with adversarial attacks on computer vision algorithms [7].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akhtar, N., & Mian, A.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2018
Volume
6
Pages
14410-14430
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962700793
Cited by
2,021
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 194 · 2024: 210 · 2023: 299 · 2022: 279 · 2021: 397 · 2020: 315 · 2019: 182 · 2018: 36
FWCI
130.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
ARC (DP 160101458)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
Keywords
adversarial attacks, adversarial perturbations, deep neural network robustness, adversarial defense, image classification, model vulnerability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review