Cited by 36Emotion and Mood RecognitionGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Inference of personality traits and affect schedule by analysis of spontaneous reactions to affective videos

Open access
Abadi, Mojtaba Khomami, Correa, Juan Abdon Miranda, Wache, Julia, Heng Yang, Patras, Ioannis, Sebe, Nicu·2015·2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)

Abstract

This paper presents a method for inferring the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and the BigFive personality traits of 35 participants through the analysis of their implicit responses to 16 emotional videos. The employed modalities to record the implicit responses are (i) EEG, (ii) peripheral physiological signals (ECG, GSR), and (iii) facial landmark trajectories. The predictions of personality traits/PANAS are done using linear regression models that are trained independently on each modality. The main findings of this study are that: (i) PANAS and personality traits of individuals can be predicted based on the users' implicit responses to affective video content, (ii) ECG+GSR signals yield 70%±8% F1-score on the distinction between extroverts/introverts, (iii) EEG signals yield 69%±6% F1-score on the distinction between creative/non creative people, and finally (iv) for the prediction of agreeableness, emotional stability, and baseline affective states we achieved significantly higher than chance-level results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fg.2015.7163100

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. F. Nasoz, K. Alvarez, C. L. Lisetti, and N. Finkelstein. Emotion Recognition from Physiological Signals for Presence Technologies. Int. J of Cog., Tech., and Work, 6(1), 2003.
  2. W. Ng. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(1):69-72, 2009.
  3. A. Strehl and J. Ghosh. Cluster ensembles-a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:583-617, 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abadi, M. K., Correa, J. A. M., Wache, J., Yang, H., Patras, I., & Sebe, N.
Affiliations
  • Telecom Italia (Italy) (IT)
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Venue
2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-05
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1583278551
Cited by
36
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
PANAS, Big Five personality traits, EEG, electrocardiogram, skin conductance, extraversion-introversion, agreeableness, emotional stability, multimodal prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review