Cited by 19Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataInternet of Things and AI

A Secure Softwarized Blockchain-based Federated Health Alliance for Next Generation IoT Networks

Das, Puja, Singh, Moutushi, Roy, Deepsubhra Guha·2021·2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)

Abstract

Medical health care centres are seen as a potential paradigm for dealing with large amounts of data utilizing artificial intelligence (AI). The fast growth in the massive volume of data created by connected devices in the health paradigm brings up new opportunities for data sharing to improve the quality of service for developing applications. Traditional AI approaches frequently need centralized data gathering and model training within a single company, which is a significant flaw owing to the lack of privacy and security of raw data transfer through mobile networks. The leakage of sensitive data can result in substantial consequences for the providers, in addition to financial loss. For that, we first build a blockchain-enabled safe data sharing architecture for distributed multiple parties in this paper. Then, by adding suggested privacy-preserved federated learning, we turn the data-sharing problem into a machine-learning challenge. Recommendations are based on the user’s previous search values, and data privacy is protected by providing the data model rather than the raw figures. Finally, we include federated learning into the permissioned blockchain consensus process, allowing the consensus computing effort to be used for federated training. According to numerical findings generated from data sets, the suggested data sharing method delivers good accuracy, high efficiency, and increased security.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/gcwkshps52748.2021.9682088

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A blockchain-enabled collaborative federated learning architecture using differential privacy for safeguarding user data and blockchain for secure sharing of data provides security to processes requiring data sharing, per theoretical analysis.

    “A blockchain-enabled collaborative FL architecture is proposed that uses DP for safeguarding user data and blockchain for secure sharing of data [30]. The theoretical analysis showed that the system provides security to the processes that require sharing of data.”
  • DP poses all relevant characteristics to mitigate all risks associated with information leakage during model parameter exchange.

    “DP also poses all relevant characteristics to mitigate all risks associated with information leakage during model parameter exchange [26,30,32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, P., Singh, M., & Roy, D. G.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Venue
2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-12
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4206924239
Cited by
19
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
blockchain, federated learning, privacy-preserving data sharing, health data security, data privacy, health data sharing, softwarized networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review