Cited by 38Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Time Series Analysis and ForecastingAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Explainable AI for time series via Virtual Inspection Layers

Open access
Vielhaben, Johanna, Lapuschkin, Sebastian, Montavon, Grégoire, Samek, Wojciech·2024·Pattern Recognition

Abstract

The field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has witnessed significant advancements in recent years. However, the majority of progress has been concentrated in the domains of computer vision and natural language processing. For time series data, where the input itself is often not interpretable, dedicated XAI research is scarce. In this work, we put forward a virtual inspection layer for transforming the time series to an interpretable representation and allows to propagate relevance attributions to this representation via local XAI methods. In this way, we extend the applicability of XAI methods to domains (e.g. speech) where the input is only interpretable after a transformation. In this work, we focus on the Fourier transformation which, is prominently applied in the preprocessing of time series, with Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) and refer to our method as DFT-LRP. We demonstrate the usefulness of DFT-LRP in various time series classification settings like audio and electronic health records. We showcase how DFT-LRP reveals differences in the classification strategies of models trained in different domains (e.g., time vs. frequency domain) or helps to discover how models act on spurious correlations in the data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110309

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various techniques have been proposed to analyze longitudinal data with XAI, but most have not yet been extensively applied to real-world clinical questions.

    “Similarly, various techniques have been proposed to analyze longitudinal data with XAI57,87–90, but most have not yet been extensively applied to real-world clinical questions.”

    From Orchestrating explainable artificial intelligence for multimodal and longitudinal data in medical imaging (2024) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Related work section (page not provided) describes numerous XAI techniques for time-series data, including applications to gait, ECG and EEG analysis. It does not assess whether most techniques have been extensively applied to real-world clinical questions, so that part of the claim is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It has been suggested that research on XAI for longitudinal data is scarce because the input (single or collective time points) often lacks meaningful interpretation to humans.

    “It has been suggested that research on XAI for longitudinal data is scarce because the input (single or collective time points) often lacks meaningful interpretation to humans57.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. M. Sundararajan, A. Taly, Q. Yan, Axiomatic attribution for deep networks, in: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 70, in: ICML, 2017, pp. 3319-3328, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1993574. 1993601. · DOI
  2. J. Vielhaben, S. Bluecher, N. Strodthoff, Multi-dimensional concept discovery (MCD): A unifying framework with completeness guarantees, Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. (ISSN: 2835-8856) (2023).
  3. M. Ancona, E. Ceolini, C. Öztireli, M.H. Gross, Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for deep neural networks, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
  4. C.J. Anders, D. Neumann, W. Samek, K.-R. Müller, S. Lapuschkin, Software for dataset-wide XAI: From local explanations to global insights with Zennit, CoRe- lAy, and ViRelAy, 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.13200, arXiv preprint 2106.13200. abs/2106.13200. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vielhaben, J., Lapuschkin, S., Montavon, G., & Samek, W.
Affiliations
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute (DE)
  • Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data (DE)
Corresponding author
Samek, Wojciech
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
150
Pages
110309
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391486587
Cited by
38
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG KI-FOR 5363)
  • Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America (101093003)
  • Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung Dienststelle Berlin
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IS180371I, 01IS21069B, 01IS18025A)
  • European Commission
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council
  • Horizon 2020 (101093003, 965221, 10174498)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
explainable AI, time series, layer-wise relevance propagation, Fourier transform, time series classification, audio classification, electronic health records, spurious correlations, frequency-domain representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review