Cited by 14Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Cross-Device Federated Learning for Mobile Health Diagnostics: A First Study on COVID-19 Detection

Open access
Xia, Tong, Han, Jing, Ghosh, Abhirup, Mascolo, Cecilia·2023·ICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) aided health diagnostic models can incorporate data from a large number of personal edge devices (e.g., mobile phones) while keeping the data local to the originating devices, largely ensuring privacy. However, such a cross-device FL approach for health diagnostics still imposes many challenges due to both local data imbalance (as extreme as local data consists of a single disease class) and global data imbalance (the disease prevalence is generally low in a population). Since the federated server has no access to data distribution information, it is not trivial to solve the imbalance issue towards an unbiased model. In this paper, we propose FedLoss, a novel cross-device FL framework for health diagnostics. Here the federated server averages the models trained on edge devices according to the predictive loss on the local data, rather than using only the number of samples as weights. As the predictive loss better quantifies the data distribution at a device, FedLoss alleviates the impact of data imbalance. Through a real-world dataset on respiratory sound and symptom-based COVID-19 detection task, we validate the superiority of FedLoss. It achieves competitive COVID-19 detection performance compared to a centralised model with an AUC-ROC of 79%. It also outperforms the state-of-the-art FL baselines in sensitivity and convergence speed. Our work not only demonstrates the promise of federated COVID-19 detection but also paves the way to a plethora of mobile health model development in a privacy-preserving fashion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10096427

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, T., Han, J., Ghosh, A., & Mascolo, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Univeristy of Cambridge
Venue
ICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06-04
Pages
1-5
ISSN
1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4372266856
Cited by
14
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
cross-device federated learning, COVID-19 detection, class imbalance, privacy-preserving machine learning, respiratory sound analysis, symptom-based diagnosis, edge devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review