Cited by 827Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataInternet of Things and AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey

Open access
Nguyen, Dinh C., Pham, Quoc-Viet, Pathirana, Pubudu N., Ding, Ming, Seneviratne, Aruna, Lin, Zihuai, Dobre, Octavia, Hwang, Won-Joo·2023·ACM Computing Surveys

Abstract

Recent advances in communication technologies and the Internet-of-Medical-Things (IOMT) have transformed smart healthcare enabled by artificial intelligence (AI). Traditionally, AI techniques require centralized data collection and processing that may be infeasible in realistic healthcare scenarios due to the high scalability of modern healthcare networks and growing data privacy concerns. Federated Learning (FL), as an emerging distributed collaborative AI paradigm, is particularly attractive for smart healthcare, by coordinating multiple clients (e.g., hospitals) to perform AI training without sharing raw data. Accordingly, we provide a comprehensive survey on the use of FL in smart healthcare. First, we present the recent advances in FL, the motivations, and the requirements of using FL in smart healthcare. The recent FL designs for smart healthcare are then discussed, ranging from resource-aware FL, secure and privacy-aware FL to incentive FL and personalized FL. Subsequently, we provide a state-of-the-art review on the emerging applications of FL in key healthcare domains, including health data management, remote health monitoring, medical imaging, and COVID-19 detection. Several recent FL-based smart healthcare projects are analyzed, and the key lessons learned from the survey are also highlighted. Finally, we discuss interesting research challenges and possible directions for future FL research in smart healthcare.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This survey reviews federated learning (FL) for smart healthcare, covering motivations, requirements, advanced FL designs, and applications in EHR management, remote health monitoring, medical imaging, and COVID-19 detection. It reports case-study accuracies and tradeoffs, then highlights challenges such as non-IID data, security, communication efficiency, and standardization.

Key findings

  • Advanced FL designs span resource-aware, secure, privacy-enhanced, incentive-aware, and personalized FL. Reported examples include Turbo-Aggregate reducing aggregation overhead from O(N²) to O(N log N), tolerating up to 50% dropping-out, and running up to 40 times faster than benchmarks; blockchain-enabled FL accuracy of 85.53% with no lazy clients versus 78.80% when 30% clients are lazy; and FL-SIGN-DP sending only 1.76 Mb versus standard FL’s 56.48 Mb.
  • Healthcare applications show competitive performance: FedHome achieved 95.87% accuracy versus 92.31% for personalized FL with MLP and 91.77% with CNN; wearable FL transfer learning improved accuracy by 5.3%; FedMood reported mood estimation above 85%; prostate cancer imaging reached 0.9722 accuracy, a 0.13% enhancement over non-FL; pathology disease detection reached up to 90% balanced accuracy; breast density classification performed 6.3% better on average than standalone training; and COVID-19 X-ray detection with ResNet18 reached 98.06%.
  • Privacy and data heterogeneity are recurring tradeoffs: higher privacy levels were associated with lower training accuracy, while label heterogeneity methods increased classification accuracy by about 16.7% on Animals-10 and by 9.153% and 11.01% on human activity recognition datasets.
  • The survey’s lessons emphasize that many FL methods are evaluated on non-healthcare datasets such as MNIST and Fashion MNIST, that no standard universal evaluation exists for federated healthcare, and that communication efficiency, trusted servers, secure aggregation, personalized FL, and next-generation network integration remain open directions.

Methods

  • Design: comprehensive narrative survey; no primary experiments are reported by the authors.
  • Data/sample: reviews recent FL literature and real-world projects, including studies using diabetic retinopathy, EHR, human activity, MRI, CT, and X-ray datasets, and projects in the US, UK, and an international COVID-19 collaboration.
  • Main analysis: organizes FL into horizontal, vertical, and federated transfer learning; synthesizes advanced designs, healthcare applications, lessons learned, and research challenges, with taxonomy tables summarizing references.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: there is no standard and universal way to evaluate FL healthcare approaches; many FL methods are evaluated on non-healthcare datasets; and surveyed works often lack verified convergence, use simple models, or report only numerical results.
  • Stated in the paper: FL cannot fully address privacy in smart healthcare, and dedicated privacy mechanisms are still needed.
  • Evident from the text: as a survey, it does not conduct primary experiments or a systematic meta-analysis, and search/inclusion criteria for the literature review are not described.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3501296

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 111 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given
    § 4.6 Lessons Learned · p. 16

    Almost all FL methods proposed in the literature are evaluated using non-healthcare datasets such as MNIST and Fashion MNIST.

    “However, it is observed that almost all the methods proposed in the literature are evaluated using non-healthcare datasets such as MNIST and Fashion MNIST.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 7

    Offloading health data to the cloud for execution incurs excessive network latency, especially when medical data have large sizes.

    “In the traditional AI-based smart healthcare systems, the offloading of health data to the cloud for execution incurs excessive network latency [29], especially when medical data often have large sizes (e.g., audio, images).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] [29] D. C. Nguyen, P. N. Pathirana, M. Ding, and A. Seneviratne, 'BEdgeHealth: A decentralized architecture for Edge-based IoMT networks using blockchain,' IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 11 743-11 757, 2021. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisereasoning
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 7

    Due to lack of datasets, training at a single medical site cannot achieve the desired degree of accuracy, such as disease classification accuracy.

    “Due to the lack of datasets, the training at an single medical site cannot achieve the desired degree of accuracy, e.g., disease classification accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § 1.1 Comparison and Our Contributions · p. 3

    A holistic taxonomy of the use of FL in emerging healthcare applications is still missing in the open literature.

    “Moreover, a holistic taxonomy of the use of FL in emerging healthcare applications is still missing in the open literature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Reliance on a central server or third party for data learning raises critical privacy issues, such as user information leakage and data breach.

    “Further, the reliance on such a central server or third party for data learning raises critical privacy issues, e.g., user information leakage and data breach [4].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] [4] S. Avancha, A. Baxi, and D. Kotz, 'Privacy in mobile technology for personal healthcare,' ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1-54, 2012. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 48
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    A centralized AI solution for smart healthcare is not efficient in communication latency due to raw data transmission and cannot achieve high network scalability.

    “Given the increasing volumes of health data and the growth of IoMT devices in modern healthcare networks, this centralized solution is not efficient in terms of communication latency due to raw data transmission and cannot achieve high network scalability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Survey · p. 1

    Traditional centralized AI for smart healthcare requires centralized data collection and processing that may be infeasible in realistic healthcare scenarios due to the high scalability of modern healthcare networks and growing data privacy concerns.

    “Traditionally, AI techniques require centralized data collection and processing that may be infeasible in realistic healthcare scenarios due to the high scalability of modern healthcare networks and growing data privacy concerns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 6

    The dataset of a single medical site may be insufficient to run the AI model, which can prevent proper health data training.

    “In realistic healthcare systems, the dataset of a single medical site (e.g., a clinical lab) may be insufficient to run the AI model which can prevent a proper health data training [26].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] [26] M. Frid-Adar, I. Diamant, E. Klang, M. Amitai, J. Goldberger, and H. Greenspan, 'Gan-based synthetic medical image augmentation for increased CNN performance in liver lesion classification,' Neurocomputing , vol. 321, pp. 321-331, 2018. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Because FL attracts large computation and dataset resources from multiple health data clients, health data training quality, such as accuracy, would be significantly improved, which might not be achieved by centralized AI with less data and limited computational capabilities.

    “Moreover, since FL attracts large computation and dataset resources from a number of health data clients to train AI models, the health data training quality, e.g., accuracy, would be significantly improved which might not be achieved by using centralized AI approaches with less data and limited computational capabilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 7

    The offloading process requires transmit power of medical devices, which poses new challenges on battery and hardware designs on devices.

    “The offloading process also requires transmit power of medical devices which in turn poses new challenges on battery and hardware designs on devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 6

    The use of traditional AI-based approaches for smart healthcare requires open data sharing with cloud or data centres, which makes health information vulnerable to privacy attacks.

    “the use of traditional AI-based approaches for realizing smart healthcare require open data sharing with cloud or data centres which makes health information vulnerable to privacy attacks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] [24] J.-J. Yang, J.-Q. Li, and Y. Niu, 'A hybrid solution for privacy preserving medical data sharing in the cloud environment,' Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 43, pp. 74-86, 2015. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 7

    Health data transfer consumes much network bandwidth, which is likely to cause network congestion when the number of devices increases.

    “Moreover, the health data transfer also consumes much network bandwidth, which is likely to cause network congestion when the number of devices increases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 6

    Adversaries can gain unauthorized access to AI training centres for data retrieval, or third parties such as cloud providers can gain control over data and modify data patterns without user consent.

    “Indeed, adversaries can gain unauthorized access to the AI training centres for data retrieval, or third parties such as cloud providers can gain the control over the data and modify data patterns without the consent of users [24].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] [24] J.-J. Yang, J.-Q. Li, and Y. Niu, 'A hybrid solution for privacy preserving medical data sharing in the cloud environment,' Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 43, pp. 74-86, 2015. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 7

    In FL-based smart healthcare, only local updates such as model gradients are required by the central server for AI training, while local health data are kept at local medical sites and devices.

    “In the FL-based smart healthcare system, only the local updates such as model gradients are required by the central server for the AI training, while the local health data are kept at local medical sites and devices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1.1 Comparison and Our Contributions · p. 3

    The latest advances in FL such as resource-aware FL, secure and privacy-enhanced FL, incentive-aware FL, and personalized FL have not been fully explored.

    “However, the latest advances in FL such as resource-aware FL, secure and privacy-enhanced FL, incentive-aware FL, and personalized FL have not been fully explored.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 7

    FL reduces the risks of leakage of sensitive user information to external third-party, thus providing a higher degree of user privacy.

    “This would reduce the risks of the leakage of sensitive user information to the external third-party, and thus providing a higher degree of user privacy [30].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] [30] Y. Zhao, J. Zhao, L. Jiang, R. Tan, D. Niyato, Z. Li, L. Lyu, and Y. Liu, 'Privacy-preserving blockchain-based federated learning for IoT devices,' IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1817-1829, 2021. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    FL potentially prevents disclosing sensitive user information and user preference, and thus mitigates privacy leakage risks.

    “This potentially prevents disclosing sensitive user information and user preference, and thus mitigates privacy leakage risks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 7

    FL saves much network bandwidth and mitigates the possibility of network congestion in massive healthcare networks.

    “As a result, FL also save much network bandwidth and mitigate possibility of network congestion in massive healthcare networks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 3.2 Requirements · p. 8

    An attack can attempt to modify or change local updates, leading to aggregation bias at the server.

    “Further, an attack can make attempt to modify or change the local updates which leads to aggregation bias at the server.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2 Requirements · p. 8

    Without involvement of multiple devices in training, FL becomes inefficient in smart healthcare, where contributed computation from different devices is highly important to improve health data training.

    “Without the involvement of multiple devices in the training, the FL concept becomes inefficient in smart healthcare, where the contributed computation from different devices are highly important to improve health data training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2 Requirements · p. 8

    An adversary can deploy data attacks to communication channels established by clients and server to steal updated information, which can interrupt model computation at the global server due to insufficient local updates to build a global model.

    “Indeed, an adversary can deploy data attacks to the communication channels established by the clients and the server to steal the updated information which can interrupt the model computation at the global server due to the insufficient local updates to build a global model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] [35] M. Nasr, R. Shokri, and A. Houmansadr, 'Comprehensive privacy analysis of deep learning: Passive and active white-box inference attacks against centralized and federated learning,' in 2019 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP) , 2019, pp. 739-753. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 7

    FL training retains model generalizability at the cost of nominal accuracy loss.

    “Moreover, FL training retains the model generalizability at the cost of nominal accuracy loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.1.1 Limitations of Current Smart Healthcare Systems. · p. 7

    Compared with conventional centralized learning, FL offers a reasonable trade-off between accuracy and utility along with privacy enhancement.

    “Compared with conventional centralized learning, FL is able to offer a reasonable trade-off between accuracy and utility along with privacy enhancement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 9

    Reputation is introduced in the context of FL-enabled healthcare systems to prevent unreliable updates from untrusted devices.

    “To prevent unreliable updates from untrusted devices, a new concept called reputation is introduced in the context of FL-enabled healthcare systems [51].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] [51] J. Kang, Z. Xiong, D. Niyato, Y. Zou, Y. Zhang, and M. Guizani, 'Reliable federated learning for mobile networks,' IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 72-80, 2020. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 10

    Blockchain can coordinate the calculation of a global model via block consensus among participants in a peer-to-peer manner.

    “The blockchain can coordinate the calculation of global model via the block consensus among participants in a peer-to-peer manner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 10

    Integrating blockchain into federated settings decentralizes FL and allows elimination of a single central server in model aggregation.

    “Particularly, the integration of blockchain into federated settings decentralizes the FL that allows for the elimination of a single central server in the model aggregation [54].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] [54] J. Passerat-Palmbach, T. Farnan, M. McCoy, J. D. Harris, S. T. Manion, H. L. Flannery, and B. Gleim, 'Blockchain-orchestrated machine learning for privacy preserving federated learning in electronic health data,' in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 550-555. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 9

    Reliable device selection is important in scenarios where local FL models are trained using low-quality and noiseless data.

    “Reliable device selection is also important in scenarios, where local FL models are trained using low-quality and noiseless data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 9

    There are potential security attacks in FL systems such as poisoning attacks, inference, backdoor attacks, malicious server, communication bottlenecks, and free-riding attacks.

    “It is important to study secure solutions for FL-enabled healthcare applications since there are potential security attacks in FL systems such as poisoning attacks, inference, backdoor attacks, malicious server, communication bottlenecks, and free-riding attacks [47-49].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [47] [47] V. Tolpegin, S. Truex, M. E. Gursoy, and L. Liu, 'Data poisoning attacks against federated learning systems,' in European Symposium on Research in Computer Security . Springer, 2020, pp. 480-501. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] [48] M. Fang, X. Cao, J. Jia, and N. Gong, 'Local model poisoning attacks to byzantine-robust federated learning,' in 29th USENIX Security Symposium USENIX Security 20) , 2020, pp. 1605-1622. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [49] [49] H. Wang, K. Sreenivasan, S. Rajput, H. Vishwakarma, S. Agarwal, J.-y. Sohn, K. Lee, and D. Papailiopoulos, 'Attack of the tails: Yes, you really can backdoor federated learning,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 33, 2020, pp. 16 070-16 084. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 9

    A malicious IoMT device may inject poisonous data into its local data, and updating the local model may degrade the accuracy of the global model.

    “For example, a malicious IoMT device may inject poisonous data into its local data, and thus updating the fall local model may degrade the accuracy of the global model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 10

    A decentralized FL design over a graph for smart healthcare allows local clients to perform local updates for several iterations and then peer-to-peer communications among health clients, reducing delay of parameter exchange and communications because models need not be transferred to a remote central server.

    “In such a way, the delay of parameter exchange and communications among clients can be reduced since there is no need to transfer the models to the remote central server.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] [53] S. Lu, Y. Zhang, and Y. Wang, 'Decentralized federated learning for electronic health records,' in 2020 54th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1-5. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Resource-aware FL · p. 9

    The MAB approach results in significantly low training loss compared with several benchmarks and outperformance in terms of training latency.

    “The experimental results show that the MAB approach results in significantly low training loss compared with several benchmarks as well as outperformance in terms of the training latency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] [39] B. Xu, W. Xia, J. Zhang, T. Q. Quek, and H. Zhu, 'Online client scheduling for fast federated learning,' IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1434-1438, 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 11

    More lazy IoMT devices decrease learning performance; for example, no lazy client achieves 85.53% accuracy while 30% lazy clients achieve 78.80% accuracy.

    “More lazy IoMT devices decrease the learning performance, e.g., no lazy client can achieve an accuracy of 85.53% while the accuracy is only 78.80% when 30% clients are lazy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55] [55] J. Li, Y. Shao, K. Wei, M. Ding, C. Ma, L. Shi, Z. Han, and H. V. Poor, 'Blockchain assisted decentralized federated learning (BLADE-FL): Performance analysis and resource allocation,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06905 , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 11

    A secure aggregation method needs to provide security guarantees under unfavorable environments such as unauthenticated transmission channels and resource-constrained edge nodes.

    “(4) It can provide security guarantees under unfavorable environments such as unauthenticated transmission channels and resource-constrained edge nodes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] [57] K. A. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, 'Practical secure aggregation for federated learning on user-held data,' in NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning , 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 11

    A secure aggregation method needs to be robust to user participant unavailability, also known as user dropping-out.

    “(3) It is robust to the user participant and unavailability (also known as user dropping-out),”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] [57] K. A. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, 'Practical secure aggregation for federated learning on user-held data,' in NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning , 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 12 · Dinh C. Nguyen, et al. · p. 12

    Turbo-Aggregate's advantages are only evaluated via numerical results, so experiments on real health datasets can be examined using the secure aggregation methods proposed so far.

    “However, such advantages are only evaluated via numerical results and thus experiments on the real health datasets can be examined by using the secure aggregation methods proposed so far.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] [58] J. So, B. Güler, and A. S. Avestimehr, 'Turbo-Aggregate: Breaking the quadratic aggregation barrier in secure federated learning,' IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 479-489, 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 11

    A secure aggregation method needs to work with high-dimensional updates from users.

    “(1) It can work with high-dimensional updates from users,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] [57] K. A. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, 'Practical secure aggregation for federated learning on user-held data,' in NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning , 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 11

    Secure aggregation approaches can be classified into secure communication protocols, dining cryptographers based secure aggregation, homomorphic threshold encryption, and pairwise masking.

    “According to [57], secure aggregation approaches can be classified into secure communication protocols, dining cryptographers (DC) based secure aggregation, homomorphic threshold encryption, and pairwise masking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] [57] K. A. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, 'Practical secure aggregation for federated learning on user-held data,' in NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning , 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 11

    A secure aggregation method needs to be communication-efficient even with massive users.

    “(2) It is communication-efficient even with massive users,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] [57] K. A. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, 'Practical secure aggregation for federated learning on user-held data,' in NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning , 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Secure FL · p. 11

    A double-masking scheme protects user privacy such that the server cannot know the user's masks.

    “A double-masking scheme is also leveraged to protect the user privacy, i.e., the server cannot know the user's masks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] [57] K. A. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, 'Practical secure aggregation for federated learning on user-held data,' in NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning , 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 Privacy-enhanced FL · p. 12

    A three-dimensional contract-based incentive approach with differential privacy obtains lower training loss and higher training accuracy compared with seminal FL.

    “Experimental results showed that the proposed three-dimensional contract-based incentive approach with differential privacy can obtain lower training loss and higher training accuracy compared with the seminal FL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] [62] M. Wu, D. Ye, J. Ding, Y. Guo, R. Yu, and M. Pan, 'Incentivizing differentially private federated learning: A multi-dimensional contract approach,' IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 14 · Dinh C. Nguyen, et al. · p. 14

    A non-cooperative game-based distributed algorithm for cross-silo FL is proved to be Nash-equilibrium and has properties such as social welfare, individual rationality, and no need for a third-party payment entity.

    “The proposed game is proved to be not only Nash-equilibrium but also has nice properties such as social welfare, individual rationality, and no need for a third-party payment entity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] [70] M. Tang and V. W. Wong, 'An incentive mechanism for cross-silo federated learning: A public goods perspective,' in INFOCOM 2021 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 4.5 Personalized FL · p. 14

    The conventional FL global model only captures statistical characteristics of different IoMT devices but is hard to provide distinct personal styles.

    “A very first challenge is that the global model only captures the statistical characteristics of different IoMT devices but is hard to provide distinct personal styles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 Privacy-enhanced FL · p. 13

    FL-SIGN-DP sends only 1.76 Mb while standard FL sends up to 56.48 Mb, while maintaining a reasonable level of privacy protection.

    “The FL-SIGN-DP is shown to consume a very small amount of bandwidth, i.e., FL-SIGN-DP sends only 1.76 Mb while the standard FL sends up to 56.48 Mb, while FL-SIGN-DP can maintain a reasonable level of privacy protection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [66] [66] R. Kerkouche, G. Acs, C. Castelluccia, and P. Genevès, 'Privacy-preserving and bandwidth-efficient federated learning: an application to in-hospital mortality prediction,' in ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4.3 Privacy-enhanced FL · p. 12

    Differentially private FL frameworks can avoid transmitting large amounts of data from distributed health organizations to a central entity and protect patient data against potential privacy attacks.

    “However, such differently private FL works in [63] and [64] are promising as their FL frameworks can avoid the need for transmitting a large amount of data from distributed health organizations to a central entity and also project the patient data against potential privacy attacks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [63] [63] M. Malekzadeh, B. Hasircioglu, N. Mital, K. Katarya, M. E. Ozfatura, and D. Gündüz, 'Dopamine: Differentially private federated learning on medical data,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.13314 , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [64] [64] O. Choudhury, A. Gkoulalas-Divanis, T. Salonidis, I. Sylla, Y. Park, G. Hsu, and A. Das, 'Differential privacy-enabled federated learning for sensitive health data,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02578 , 2020. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 Privacy-enhanced FL · p. 12

    Based on local model updates from an IoMT device, an attacker can infer and recover local data using construction attacks and/or predict the existence of a data sample in the local training dataset via membership inference attacks.

    “For example, based on the local model updates from an IoMT device, the attacker can infer and recover the local data using the construction attacks [60] and/or predict the existence of a data sample in the local training dataset such as blood type, disease name, gender information, and any other private information, which can be done via membership inference attacks [61].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [60] [60] L. Zhu and S. Han, 'Deep leakage from gradients,' in Federated Learning . Springer, 2020, pp. 17-31. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [61] [61] M. Nasr, R. Shokri, and A. Houmansadr, 'Machine learning with membership privacy using adversarial regularization,' in Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2018, pp. 634-646. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 Privacy-enhanced FL · p. 12

    A differentially private FL method using DP-SGD and homomorphic encryption secure aggregation achieves performance close to the centralized approach while significantly outperforming FL with parallel differential privacy and FL with centralized differential privacy on the DR dataset for diabetic retinopathy.

    “Experimental results show that the performance of the proposed method is close the that of the centralized approach, while significantly outperforming several benchmarks such as FL with parallel differential privacy, where different hospitals apply differential privacy on their datasets individually and FL with centralized differential privacy, where a trusted entity is required to apply different”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] [63] M. Malekzadeh, B. Hasircioglu, N. Mital, K. Katarya, M. E. Ozfatura, and D. Gündüz, 'Dopamine: Differentially private federated learning on medical data,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.13314 , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 Privacy-enhanced FL · p. 12

    FL has privacy concerns such as membership attacks, unintentional data leakage, and generative adversarial network based inference attacks.

    “Despite the great potential in improving user data privacy, FL also has its own privacy concerns such as membership attacks, unintentional data leakage, generative adversarial network based inference attacks [50].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] [50] V. Mothukuri, R. M. Parizi, S. Pouriyeh, Y. Huang, A. Dehghantanha, and G. Srivastava, 'A survey on security and privacy of federated learning,' Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 115, pp. 619-640, 2021. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Incentive-aware FL · p. 13

    Incentive mechanisms designed for FL can be categorized by data contribution, device reputation, and resource allocation.

    “According to a recent survey [67], incentive mechanisms designed for FL can be categorized by different aspects, including the device's data contribution, device reputation, and resource allocation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] [67] Y. Zhan, J. Zhang, Z. Hong, L. Wu, P. Li, and S. Guo, 'A survey of incentive mechanism design for federated learning,' IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.5 Personalized FL · p. 15

    An alpha-weighted update solves label heterogeneity by aggregating overlapping label information at the central server, increasing classification accuracy by about 16.7% on Animals-10 and by average increases of 9.153% and 11.01% on human activity recognition datasets.

    “The proposed approach is examined on the Animals-10 dataset [75], showing that the classification accuracy is increased by about 16.7%. This approach is also tested on the human activity recognition dataset with an average increase of 9.153% 11.01% in [76] and [77], respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [74] [74] G. K. Gudur, B. S. Balaji, and S. K. Perepu, 'Resource-constrained federated learning with heterogeneous labels and models,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03206 , 2020. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [76] [76] G. K. Gudur and S. K. Perepu, 'Resource-constrained federated learning with heterogeneous labels and models for human activity recognition,' in Deep Learning for Human Activity Recognition: Second International Workshop, DL-HAR 2020, Held in Conjunction with IJCAI-PRICAI 2020, Kyoto, Japan, January 8, 2021, Proceedings . Springer Nature, 2020, p. 57. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [77] [77] G. Krishna Gudur and S. K. Perepu, 'Federated learning with heterogeneous labels and models for mobile activity monitoring,' arXiv e-prints , pp. arXiv-2012, 2020. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.5 Personalized FL · p. 14

    Personalized FL faces the challenge of heterogeneous computing resources and network conditions of different FL devices.

    “Another challenge is heterogeneous computing resources and network conditions of different FL devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 FL for Federated EHRs Management · p. 18

    A lightweight data perturbation method in FL for EHRs analytic management perturbs training-related data and can defend against model memorization attacks.

    “To ensure privacy for model parameters in the FL process, a lightweight data perturbation method is considered to perturb the training-related data, which thus can defend model memorization attack in the learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] [65] M. Hao, H. Li, G. Xu, Z. Liu, and Z. Chen, 'Privacy-aware and resource-saving collaborative learning for healthcare in cloud computing,' in ICC 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , 2020, pp. 1-6. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.5 Personalized FL · p. 15

    Label heterogeneity is a new challenge in FL design where each FL device has its own definition of data labels and learning model, independent of definitions in other devices and the central server.

    “The work in [74] identifies a new challenge in FL design, which is called label heterogeneity. Concretely, each FL device has its own definition of data labels and learning model, which is independent of the definitions in other devices and the central server.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [74] [74] G. K. Gudur, B. S. Balaji, and S. K. Perepu, 'Resource-constrained federated learning with heterogeneous labels and models,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03206 , 2020. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.5 Personalized FL · p. 14

    FedHome achieves 95.87% accuracy while personalized FL with MLP and CNN achieve only 92.31% and 91.77%, respectively.

    “For example, FedHome can achieve the accuracy of 95.87% while the personalized FL with multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN) can only achieve 92.31% and 91.77%, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] [72] Q. Wu, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, and J. Zhang, 'FedHome: Cloud-edge based personalized federated learning for in-home health monitoring,' IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , 2020. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 FL for Federated EHRs Management · p. 18

    SplitNN implements vanilla FL with split learning by offloading the weights of the split layer without requiring raw data sharing.

    “By splitting the network into multiple sections that are then transmitted to distributed clients, the network training can be implemented by offloading the weights of the split layer, while raw data sharing is not required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [84] [84] P. Vepakomma, O. Gupta, T. Swedish, and R. Raskar, 'Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient data,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.00564 , 2018. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.5 Personalized FL · p. 15

    A personalized FL framework for pain prediction using face images with a lightweight CNN and local last-layer parameters outperforms conventional FL on the UNBC-McMaster Shoulder Pain dataset.

    “The proposed model is evaluated by using the UNBC-McMaster Shoulder Pain dataset [79], showing that the proposed personalized FL with privacy preserving outperforms the conventional FL approach, which shares all the learning updates with the aggregation server, which in turn increases the probability of data breach.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [78] [78] O. Rudovic, N. Tobis, S. Kaltwang, B. Schuller, D. Rueckert, J. F. Cohn, and R. W. Picard, 'Personalized federated deep learning for pain estimation from face images,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.04800 , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [79] [79] P. Lucey, J. F. Cohn, K. M. Prkachin, P. E. Solomon, and I. Matthews, 'Painful data: The UNBC-McMaster shoulder pain expression archive database,' in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG) , 2011, pp. 57-64. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.4 FL for Federated COVID-19 Detection and Diagnosis · p. 23

    FL can be an ideal candidate for assisting COVID-19 detection by its federation and privacy protection features.

    “FL can be an ideal candidate for assisting COVID-19 detection, by its federation and privacy protection features.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 FL for Federated Remote Health Monitoring · p. 19

    The FL-based approach for in-home health monitoring achieves a high accuracy of 95.41%, an increase by 7.49% over the standalone CNN scheme with low communication costs, in both balanced and imbalanced data cases.

    “Extensive experiments are implemented using a realistic human activity dataset, showing that the FL-based approach can achieve a high accuracy of 95.41%, an increase by 7.49% over the standalone CNN scheme with low communication costs, in both the balanced and imbalanced data cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] [72] Q. Wu, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, and J. Zhang, 'FedHome: Cloud-edge based personalized federated learning for in-home health monitoring,' IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , 2020. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.4 FL for Federated COVID-19 Detection and Diagnosis · p. 23

    Simulations from 34,006 CT scan slices of 89 subjects verify a high COVID-19 X-ray image classification and low data loss in the FL algorithm.

    “Simulations from 34,006 CT scan slices (images) of 89 subjects verify a high COVID-19 X-ray image classification and low data loss in the FL algorithm running.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [112] [112] R. Kumar, A. A. Khan, S. Zhang, J. Kumar, T. Yang, N. A. Golalirz, Zakria, I. Ali, S. Shafiq, and W. Wang, 'Blockchain-federated-learning and deep learning models for COVID-19 detection using CT imaging,' arXiv:2007.06537 [cs, eess] , 2020, arXiv: 2007.06537. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.3 FL for Federated Medical Imaging · p. 21

    An FL model for federated brain imaging using DNNs for brain tumour segmentation achieves similar segmentation performance with the ideal centralized scheme while a degree of privacy protection is achieved.

    “Simulations are conducted using a brain tumour dataset containing multiparametric pre-operative MRI scans of 285 subjects, indicating a similar segmentation performance with the ideal centralized scheme, while a degree of privacy protection is achieved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [99] [99] W. Li, F. Milletarì, D. Xu, N. Rieke, J. Hancox, W. Zhu, M. Baust, Y. Cheng, S. Ourselin, M. J. Cardoso brain tumour segmentation,' in International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging et al. , 'Privacy-preserving federated , 2019, pp. 133-141. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: Patients only trust their local hospital, and hospitals are non-malicious and non-colluding, while the server might be honest but curious.
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 FL for Federated Remote Health Monitoring · p. 20

    Simulations for an FL setting with 10 hospital sites show better precision and recall performance compared to non-FL approaches for obesity phenotyping.

    “Simulations for an FL setting with 10 hospital sites show a better precision and recall performance compared to non-FL approaches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [93] [93] D. Liu, D. Dligach, and T. Miller, 'Two-stage federated phenotyping and patient representation learning,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05596 , 2019. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.3 FL for Federated Medical Imaging · p. 21

    An FL approach for medical imaging with GANs yields an accuracy score of 0.9722, achieving a performance enhancement by 0.13% compared to non-FL schemes on prostate cancer-related images.

    “Through the simulations on prostate cancer-related images, the proposed FL scheme can yield an accuracy score of 0.9722, achieving a performance enhancement by 0.13% in comparison to non-FL schemes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [98] [98] Z. Yan, J. Wicaksana, Z. Wang, X. Yang, and K.-T. Cheng, 'Variation-aware federated learning with multi-source decentralized medical image data,' IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics , 2020.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 FL for Federated EHRs Management · p. 18

    Patient clustering captures similar diagnoses and geographical locations to train a neural network model to forecast mortality based on drug features.

    “Moreover, to support the federated mortality prediction, patient clustering is adopted in [86], where patient subgroups capture similar diagnoses and geographical locations to train a neural network model to forecast mortality based on drug features.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [86] [86] L. Huang, A. L. Shea, H. Qian, A. Masurkar, H. Deng, and D. Liu, 'Patient clustering improves efficiency of federated machine learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed electronic medical records,' Journal of biomedical informatics , vol. 99, p. 103291, 2019. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 FL for Federated Remote Health Monitoring · p. 21

    A disease prediction method using FL on a large nationwide health insurance dataset distributed over 99 medical sites achieves competitive performance in terms of high accuracy rates and privacy protection compared to centralized learning and local training without federation.

    “By comparing with conventional approaches such as centralized learning, local training without federation, the FL method achieves a competitive performance in terms of high accuracy rates and privacy protection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [95] [95] D. Liu, T. A. Miller, and K. D. Mandl, 'Confederated machine learning on horizontally and vertically separated medical data for large-scale health system intelligence,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02109 , 2019. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 FL for Federated Remote Health Monitoring · p. 19

    FL can be used for facilitating in-home health monitoring by training a global model from distributed homes under the control of a server while preventing data leakage by keeping user data locally.

    “FL can be used for facilitating in-home health monitoring, by training a global model from distributed homes under the control of a server, e.g., a cloud server, while preventing data leakage by keeping user data locally [72].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] [72] Q. Wu, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, and J. Zhang, 'FedHome: Cloud-edge based personalized federated learning for in-home health monitoring,' IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , 2020. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 FL for Federated EHRs Management · p. 18

    A statistic channel-based FL solution that uploads a small fraction of local gradients stochastically by choosing channels with the most substantial variation improves training convergence rates compared to traditional FL schemes.

    “A binary classification problem is formulated for mortality prediction using NNs in the FL simulation, showing an improvement in training convergence rates compared to traditional FL schemes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] [85] R. Shao, H. He, H. Liu, and D. Liu, 'Stochastic channel-based federated learning for medical data privacy preserving,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.11160 , 2019. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 6.3 FL for International COVID-19 Project · p. 28

    Real-world FL project for COVID-19 region segmentation in chest CT with medical institutions from China, Italy, and Japan: FL-based approach captures better ground truth shapes and has less false positives compared to traditional local training.

    “Compared with the traditional local training approach using 945 scans with the support of expert radiologists, the FL-based approach is able to capture better the ground truth shapes and has less false positives with the collaboration of training resources from multiple medical centres.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [118] [118] D. Yang, Z. Xu, W. Li, A. Myronenko, H. R. Roth, S. Harmon, S. Xu, B. Turkbey, E. Turkbey, X. Wang, W. Zhu, G. Carrafiello, F. Patella, M. Cariati, H. Obinata, H. Mori, K. Tamura, P. An, B. J. Wood, and D. Xu, 'Federated semi-supervised learning for COVID region segmentation in chest CT using multi-national data from China, Italy, Japan,' Medical Image Analysis , vol. 70, p. 101992, 2021. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 6.1 FL for Medical Imaging, US · p. 25

    Real-world experiment at University of Pennsylvania and 19 other institutions shows FL-based approach can achieve training accuracy rate of up to 90% on image datasets, competitive with centralized scheme.

    “Several preliminary real-world experiments has been conduced at the centre of Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics of the University of Pennsylvania, showing that the FL-based approach can achieve an training accuracy rate of up to 90% on image datasets, a competitive performance compared with the centralized scheme.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [119] [119] 'Federated learning for medical imaging,' 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/artificialintelligence/posts/federated-learning-for-medical-imaging.html -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 5.5 Lessons Learned · p. 24

    FL is useful for facilitating in-home health monitoring by training a global model from distributed homes under a data server while preventing data leakage by keeping user data locally.

    “FL is also useful for facilitating in-home health monitoring, by training a global model from distributed homes under the control of a data server, while preventing data leakage by keeping user data locally [92], [93].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [92] [92] Y. Chen, X. Qin, J. Wang, C. Yu, and W. Gao, 'Fedhealth: A federated transfer learning framework for wearable healthcare,' IEEE Intelligent Systems , vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 83-93, 2020. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [93] [93] D. Liu, D. Dligach, and T. Miller, 'Two-stage federated phenotyping and patient representation learning,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05596 , 2019. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7.5 FL-based Healthcare in Next-Generation Networks · p. 29

    Many new technologies are introduced to meet much stricter 6G requirements such as blockchain, compressive sensing, THz and visible light communications, 3D networking, quantum communication, and large intelligence surface.

    “At the same time, many new technologies are introduced to meet much stricter 6G requirements such as blockchain, compressive sensing, THz and visible light communications, 3D networking, quantum communication, and large intelligence surface [123].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [123] [123] C. de Alwis, A. Kalla, Q.-V. Pham, P. Kumar, K. Dev, W.-J. Hwang, and M. Liyanage, 'Survey on 6G frontiers: Trends, applications, requirements, technologies and future research,' IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 2, pp. 836-886, 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 7.8 Non-iidness and Data Quality in FL-based Smart Healthcare · p. 30

    Label distributions differ across medical institutions, making them challenging to join the federated data training.

    “In this case, the label distributions differ across medical institutions, making them challenging to join the federated data training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7.6 FL with Provable Privacy Guarantee · p. 29

    FL privacy issues can be categorized as membership inference attacks, unintentional information leakage, and generative adversarial network.

    “According to [13], FL privacy issues can be categorized as membership inference attacks, unintentional information leakage, and generative adversarial network.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] [13] V. Mothukuri, R. M. Parizi, S. Pouriyeh, Y. Huang, A. Dehghantanha, and G. Srivastava, 'A survey on security and privacy of federated learning,' Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 115, pp. 619-640, 2021. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 7.5 FL-based Healthcare in Next-Generation Networks · p. 29

    Future e-health services will be advanced by AI and FL capabilities, thus enhancing the quality of life and reducing the hospitalizations for patients.

    “For example, future e-health services will be advanced by AI and FL capabilities, thus enhancing the quality of life and reducing the hospitalizations for patients [124].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [124] [124] L. Mucchi, S. Jayousi, S. Caputo, E. Paoletti, P. Zoppi, S. Geli, and P. Dioniso, 'How 6G technology can change the future wireless healthcare,' in 2020 2nd 6G wireless summit (6G SUMMIT) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1-6. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7.5 FL-based Healthcare in Next-Generation Networks · p. 29

    There have been many research and development activities towards future 6G wireless systems.

    “Although 5G networks are not fully available and commercially deployed over the world, there have been many research and development activities towards future 6G wireless systems [123].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [123] [123] C. de Alwis, A. Kalla, Q.-V. Pham, P. Kumar, K. Dev, W.-J. Hwang, and M. Liyanage, 'Survey on 6G frontiers: Trends, applications, requirements, technologies and future research,' IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 2, pp. 836-886, 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7.5 FL-based Healthcare in Next-Generation Networks · p. 29

    6G enables the availability of many applications such as Industry 5.0, intelligent healthcare, smart grid, holographic telepresence, and personalized body area networks.

    “6G enables the availability of many applications such as Industry 5.0, intelligent healthcare, smart grid, holographic telepresence, and personalized body area networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [123] [123] C. de Alwis, A. Kalla, Q.-V. Pham, P. Kumar, K. Dev, W.-J. Hwang, and M. Liyanage, 'Survey on 6G frontiers: Trends, applications, requirements, technologies and future research,' IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 2, pp. 836-886, 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 7.3 Quality of Federated Healthcare Training Data · p. 28

    Game theory and blockchain are two important tools for designing incentive mechanisms for federated learning.

    “Game theory and blockchain are two important tools for designing incentive mechanisms”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [32] [32] L. U. Khan, S. R. Pandey, N. H. Tran, W. Saad, Z. Han, M. N. Nguyen, and C. S. Hong, 'Federated learning for edge networks: Resource optimization and incentive mechanism,' IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 88-93, 2020. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46] [46] J. Xu, H. Wang, and L. Chen, 'Bandwidth allocation for multiple federated learning services in wireless edge networks,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.03627 , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [55] [55] J. Li, Y. Shao, K. Wei, M. Ding, C. Ma, L. Shi, Z. Han, and H. V. Poor, 'Blockchain assisted decentralized federated learning (BLADE-FL): Performance analysis and resource allocation,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06905 , 2021. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] [56] J. Kang, Z. Xiong, D. Niyato, S. Xie, and J. Zhang, 'Incentive mechanism for reliable federated learning: A joint optimization approach to combining reputation and contract theory,' IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 10 700-10 714, 2019. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [68] [68] Y. Sarikaya and O. Ercetin, 'Motivating workers in federated learning: A stackelberg game perspective,' IEEE Networking Letters , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23-27, 2019. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 8 CONCLUSIONS · p. 30

    FL is expected to play a key role in realizing large-scale and collaborative healthcare systems and allow for a shift from centralized health data analytics to distributed healthcare operations with privacy awareness.

    “FL is expected to play a key role in realizing large-scale and collaborative healthcare systems and allow for a shift from centralized health data analytics to distributed healthcare operations with privacy awareness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 8 CONCLUSIONS · p. 30

    The application of FL in smart healthcare is still at its infancy and will quickly mature in the coming years for providing intelligent and privacy-enhanced health services.

    “The application of FL in smart healthcare is still at its infancy and will quickly mature in the coming years for providing intelligent and privacy-enhanced health services.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
72 of 72
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In future healthcare systems, health data are not centrally located but distributed over a large-scale IoMT network.

    “Moreover, in the future healthcare systems, such a centralized AI architecture may be no longer suitable because health data are not centrally located, but distributed over a large-scale IoMT network.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Non-IID data distribution across clients can make FL training highly divergent.

    “In this context, one of the key concerns in dataset preparation is the non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) issue which potentially makes the FL training highly divergent in the data training.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Designing reliable user selection in smart healthcare systems faces challenges including no universal metric for reliability evaluation, no universal selection scheme, and no real-time user monitoring methods.

    “However, designing reliable user selection in smart healthcare systems faces several challenges such as no universal metric for reliability evaluation, no universal selection scheme, and no real-time user monitoring methods.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Conventional FL approaches require all IoMT devices to share local model updates with the aggregation server, but this is not always available in practice because IoMT devices are usually limited in computing resources, radio bandwidth, privacy concerns, and server trustworthiness.

    “Conventional FL approaches require all IoMT devices to share local model updates with the aggregation server; however, it is not always available in practice. It is since the IoMT devices are usually limited in terms of computing resources, radio bandwidth, and privacy concerns for personal data and server trustworthiness, thus having no willingness to share their models.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    EHRs data in healthcare systems are highly sensitive and private compared to other domains.

    “Indeed, compared to other domains, EHRs data in healthcare systems are highly sensitive and private.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Removal of metadata such as patient information is insufficient to preserve patient privacy, especially in complex healthcare settings where multiple parties have access to the common healthcare database.

    “The removal of metadata such as patient information is insufficient to preserve the privacy of patients, especially in the complex healthcare settings where multiple parties such as hospitals and insurance companies have access to the common healthcare database as part of their employment requirements, including data analysis and processing.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Users' personalized data is usually insufficient.

    “The reason for this is that users' personalized data is usually insufficient.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Patients only trust their local hospital, and hospitals are non-malicious and non-colluding, while the server might be honest but curious.

    “It is assumed that patients only trust their local hospital, and hospitals are non-malicious and non-colluding, while the server might be honest but curious.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Depression patients often have different typing speeds compared to normal people.

    “This is inherited from the fact that the depression patients often have different typing speeds compared to normal people.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Training quality can be greatly degraded due to the heterogeneity of computational capabilities and data qualities of different hospital sites.

    “The training quality can be greatly degraded due to the heterogeneity of computational capabilities and data qualities of different hospital sites.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In realistic healthcare scenarios, different clients may have different datasets such as text, images, audio, and time series, and different data content such as blood type, heart rate, face images, and body temperature.

    “In realistic healthcare scenarios, different clients may have different datasets such as text, images, audio, and time series, and different data content such as blood type, heart rate, face images, and body temperature.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The patient's information can be inferred when the patient's device sends the local model updates to the central server located at the hospitals and health organizations.

    “Moreover, the patient's information can be inferred when the patient's device sends the local model updates to the central server located at the hospitals and health organizations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In FL-based smart healthcare systems, several participants at the client side can act as attackers and try to send poisonous model updates or fake information to degrade the model aggregation.

    “In FL-based smart healthcare systems, several participants at the client side can act as attackers and try to send poisonous model updates or fake information to degrade the model aggregation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An adversary can contaminate information about data features during the local data training or modify local updates during the model transmission between local clients and the central server.

    “Further, an adversary can contaminate information about data features during the local data training or modify local updates during the model transmission between local clients and the central server.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At the server side, an external adversary can deploy attacks to steal information about the aggregated global model, which leads to serious privacy concerns such as information leakage.

    “At the server side, an external adversary can deploy attacks to steal information about the aggregated global model, which leads to serious privacy concerns such as information leakage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Non-iidness of the medical datasets potentially makes the FL training divergent.

    “To achieve a desirable training performance in FL-based healthcare systems, a critical problem to be addressed is the non-iidness of the medical datasets which potentially makes the FL training divergent in the training.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of a comprehensive survey on the FL-healthcare topic in the open literature.

    “Given the lack of a comprehensive survey on the FL-healthcare topic in the open literature, this paper has provided a detailed survey of the use of FL in smart healthcare.”
17 of 17

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some survey papers cover very broad areas in medicine and healthcare applications without detailed introduction on federated learning in medical image analysis.

    “And some survey papers cover very broad areas in medicine and healthcare applications [23,24], without detailed introduction on federated learning in medical image analysis.”

    From Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Reviews [3], [9], and [6] included the whole healthcare area to survey and review papers.

    “Similarly in [3], [9], and [6] the authors have included the whole healthcare area to survey and review the papers.”
  • Existing systematic literature reviews on FL in healthcare covered overall healthcare applications rather than specifically medical image analysis.

    “Meanwhile, some SLR have been published on the topic, however, they were about overall healthcare applications not particularly for the medical image analysis context.”
  • An adversary can attack and get user information by using construction attacks.

    “The adversary can attack and get the user information by using construction attacks [49].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • FedAvg attribution conflicts with the cited reference

    Minor

    The text attributes the FedAvg algorithm to Google and cites [19], but reference [19] is listed as a paper by Ye and colleagues on vehicular edge computing.

  • Medical-imaging accuracy is reported despite a table saying it was not investigated

    Minor

    The discussion reports an accuracy score for the method in [98], but Table 5 lists lack of an accuracy investigation as a limitation of that same work.

  • CT scans are described as X-ray images

    Minor

    The same reported experiment identifies its 34,006 images as CT scan slices, then describes its result as X-ray image classification.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.5555/3489212.3489304 · DOI
  2. Hongyi Wang, Kartik Sreenivasan, Shashank Rajput, Harit Vishwakarma, Saurabh Agarwal, Jy-yong Sohn, Kangwook Lee, and Dimitris Papailiopoulos. 2020. Attack of the tails: Yes, you really can backdoor federated learning. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 33. 16070–16084.
  3. Viraaji Mothukuri Reza M. Parizi Seyedamin Pouriyeh Yan Huang Ali Dehghantanha and Gautam Srivastava. 2021. A survey on security and privacy of federated learning. SeeMothukuri et al. [13] 619–640. · DOI · Paper page
  4. K. A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone, H. Brendan McMahan, Sarvar Patel, Daniel Ramage, Aaron Segal, and Karn Seth. 2016. Practical secure aggregation for federated learning on user-held data. In Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning.
  5. 10.1109/JSAIT.2021.3054610 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gautham Krishna Gudur and Satheesh Kumar Perepu. 2020. Resource-constrained federated learning with heterogeneous labels and models for human activity recognition. In Proceedings of the Deep Learning for Human Activity Recognition: Second International Workshop, DL-HAR 2020, Held in Conjunction with IJCAI-PRICAI 2020, Kyoto, Japan, January 8, 2021, Proceedings. Springer Nature, 57.
  7. Gautham Krishna Gudur and Satheesh K. Perepu. 2020. Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Labels and Models for Mobile Activity Monitoring. arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv–2012.
  8. 10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Mohammad Malekzadeh Burak Hasircioglu Nitish Mital Kunal Katarya Mehmet Emre Ozfatura and Deniz Gündüz. 2021. Dopamine: Differentially Private Federated Learning on Medical Data. arXiv–2101.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, D. C., Pham, Q.-V., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., Seneviratne, A., Lin, Z., Dobre, O., & Hwang, W.-J.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Pusan National University (KR)
  • Data61 (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Venue
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2022-02-03
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
1-37
ISSN
  • 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7341
OpenAlex
W4226461837
Cited by
827
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 169 · 2025: 282 · 2024: 214 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 42
FWCI
54.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Korean Government (NRF-2019R1C1C1006143, NRF-2019R1I1A3A01060518 and 2020-0-01450)
  • Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation
  • Artificial Intelligence Convergence Research Center [Pusan National University]
  • MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea
  • Grand Information Technology Research Center support program (IITP-2021-2016-0-00318)
  • IITP
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
federated learning, smart healthcare, Internet of Medical Things, data privacy, privacy-preserving federated learning, incentive mechanisms, personalized federated learning, remote patient monitoring, diagnostic imaging, COVID-19 detection, health data management, distributed learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review