CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 154Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFood Supply Chain TraceabilityBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data Management in Supply Chain Using Blockchain: Challenges and a Case Study

Wu, Hanqing, Cao, Jiannong, Yang, Yanni, Tung, Cheung Leong, Jiang, Shan, Tang, Bin, Liu, Yang, Wang, Xiaoqing, Deng, Yuming·2019·2019 28th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)
DOI 10.1109/icccn.2019.8846964
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Supply chain management (SCM) is fundamental for gaining financial, environmental and social benefits in the supply chain industry. However, traditional SCM mechanisms usually suffer from a wide scope of issues such as lack of information sharing, long delays for data retrieval, and unreliability in product tracing. Recent advances in blockchain technology show great potential to tackle these issues due to its salient features including immutability, transparency, and decentralization. Although there are some proof-of-concept studies and surveys on blockchain-based SCM from the perspective of logistics, the underlying technical challenges are not clearly identified. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive analysis of potential opportunities, new requirements, and principles of designing blockchain-based SCM systems. We summarize and discuss four crucial technical challenges in terms of scalability, throughput, access control, data retrieval and review the promising solutions. Finally, a case study of designing blockchain-based food traceability system is reported to provide more insights on how to tackle these technical challenges in practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icccn.2019.8846964

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 2019, ET Docker
  2. 2019, Hyperledger fabric
  3. biggs, 2018, Blockchain Revolutionizing the global supply chain by building trust and transparency
  4. 2019, Farmshare
  5. 2019, Provenance
  6. 2019, Bitcoin Blokchain Transactions Per Second
  7. 2019, Wikipedia supply chain
  8. 2019, Inc advanced solutions international
  9. 2019, Gartner report on supply chain management
  10. 2019, Ripe io
  11. 2019, Ethereum Blockchain Size
  12. 2019, Bitcoin Blockchain Size
  13. 2019, The mini-blockchain scheme

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–154 of 154

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wu, H., Cao, J., Yang, Y., Tung, C. L., Jiang, S., Tang, B., Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Deng, Y.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
ORCID
Venue
2019 28th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-07
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1095-2055 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/icccn.2019.8846964
OpenAlex
W2975103933
Cited by
154
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 10
FWCI
14.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, supply chain management, food traceability, scalability, throughput, access control, data retrieval, information sharing, decentralization (distributed systems), immutability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review