Cited by 397Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFood Supply Chain TraceabilityBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

RETRACTED: Research on agricultural supply chain system with double chain architecture based on blockchain technology

Leng, Kaijun, Bi, Ya, Jing, Linbo, Fu, Han-Chi, Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke·2018·Future Generation Computer Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2018.04.061This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other works in macro-cluster C1 propose a proof of concept based on Ethereum [79], Matlab [81], and an experimental blockchain based on three nodes [76].

    “Other works in macro-cluster C 1 propose a proof of concept based on Ethereum [79], Matlab [81], and an experimental blockchain based on three nodes [76].”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

  • Some documents in macro-clusters C1 and C2 present proofs of their concepts.

    “Some of them propose new platforms just at a concept level [45,51,52,75,77,83,84,88,89,91], some of them present proofs of their concepts [76,79,81], and only three of them present a real implementation based on real blockchains: [78,80,82].”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

  • The data in Tables 5-7 highlight right supply-demand matching in agricultural supply chains as an objective achievable through blockchain adoption.

    “From the data in Tables 567, other important possible objectives, achievable through the adoption of the blockchain technology, can be highlighted: regulatory compliance in pharmaceutical supply chains [78], right supply-demand matching in agricultural supply chains [81], and alignment of information sharing among supply chain actors [83].”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

  • [81] has a proof of concept based on Matlab.

    “Matlab”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leng, K., Bi, Y., Jing, L., Fu, H.-C., & Van Nieuwenhuyse, I.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN)
  • Hubei University Of Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
Fu, Han-Chi
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
86
Pages
641-649
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802453496
Cited by
397
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 7
FWCI
72.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (70160376)
  • Hubei society of social sciences (2016101)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
agricultural supply chain, blockchain, public blockchain, resource matching, consensus algorithms, distributed scheduling, public service platform, transaction privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review