Cited by 7Spam and Phishing DetectionNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Insider Threat Detection Using Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers and Optimized AdaBoost Classifier

Kumpf, Katarina, Protic, Mihajlo, Jovanovic, Luka, Cajic, Miroslav, Zivkovic, Miodrag, Bacanin, Nebojsa·2024·2024 International Conference on Circuit, Systems and Communication (ICCSC)

Abstract

Cybersecurity plays an increasingly vital role in contemporary times, particularly as large companies face escalating threats and substantial losses, with ransomware attacks standing out as one of the more sophisticated forms of intrusion. In such attacks, hackers infiltrate systems, encrypt crucial company data, and then demand a ransom for data decryption or the restoration of control over the system. The application of natural language processing (NLP) emerges as a promising avenue, offering the potential to analyze attack patterns and recognize malicious intentions before actual attempts occur. Given the inherent specificity of each system, fine-tuning AI algorithms with special settings becomes imperative for optimal efficiency. This research delves into the synergy of NLP and robust classification algorithms to detect cyber attacks through website content analysis. Recognizing that classifier performance hinges on the judicious selection of hyperparameters, we explore a modified version of the recently introduced red fox algorithm (RFO). This adaptation is combined with bidirectional encoder representations from transformers to identify malicious intent in email content. The proposed approach undergoes testing on a real-world dataset, with the best models demonstrating an accuracy of 0.975822 suggesting viability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccsc62074.2024.10616526

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kumpf et al. (2024) introduced an approach combining modified Red Fox algorithm with BERT to detect cyber-attacks through website content analysis, achieving accuracy of 0.975822 on a real-world dataset.

    “Kumpf et al. (2024) [54] introduced a novel approach that combines a modified Red Fox (RFO) algorithm with bidirectional encoder representations from transformers to detect cyber-attacks through website content analysis, achieving an accuracy of 0.975822 on a real-world dataset.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumpf, K., Protic, M., Jovanovic, L., Cajic, M., Zivkovic, M., & Bacanin, N.
Affiliations
  • Singidunum University (RS)
  • Singidunum University,Faculty of Informatics and Computing,Belgrade,Serbia
  • Univerzitet Union Nikola Tesla (RS)
Venue
2024 International Conference on Circuit, Systems and Communication (ICCSC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-06-28
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4401358929
Cited by
7
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Circuit, Systems and Communication (ICCSC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
insider threat detection, ransomware, BERT, AdaBoost, hyperparameter optimization, email content analysis, malicious intent detection, website content analysis, cybersecurity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review