The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Matrix Backpropagation for Deep Networks with Structured Layers
Abstract
Deep neural network architectures have recently produced excellent results in a variety of areas in artificial intelligence and visual recognition, well surpassing traditional shallow architectures trained using hand-designed features. The power of deep networks stems both from their ability to perform local computations followed by pointwise non-linearities over increasingly larger receptive fields, and from the simplicity and scalability of the gradient-descent training procedure based on backpropagation. An open problem is the inclusion of layers that perform global, structured matrix computations like segmentation (e.g. normalized cuts) or higher-order pooling (e.g. log-tangent space metrics defined over the manifold of symmetric positive definite matrices) while preserving the validity and efficiency of an end-to-end deep training framework. In this paper we propose a sound mathematical apparatus to formally integrate global structured computation into deep computation architectures. At the heart of our methodology is the development of the theory and practice of backpropagation that generalizes to the calculus of adjoint matrix variations. We perform segmentation experiments using the BSDS and MSCOCO benchmarks and demonstrate that deep networks relying on second-order pooling and normalized cuts layers, trained end-to-end using matrix backpropagation, outperform counterparts that do not take advantage of such global layers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge
Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · Cited by 19,599
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
A Combined Corner and Edge Detector
Harris, C., & Stephens, M. (1988) · Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988 · doi:10.5244/c.2.23 · Cited by 12,901
Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFs
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., & Yuille, A. L. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.7062 · Cited by 4,213
Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks
Zheng, S., Jayasumana, S., Romera-Paredes, B., Vineet, V., Su, Z., Du, D., Huang, C., & Torr, P. H. S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.179 · Cited by 2,386
Efficient Piecewise Training of Deep Structured Models for Semantic Segmentation
Lin, G., Shen, C., van den Hengel, A., & Reid, I. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.348 · Cited by 862
Cited by
Review of Image Classification Algorithms Based on Convolutional Neural Networks
Chen, L., Li, S., Bai, Q., Yang, J., Jiang, S., & Miao, Y. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13224712 · Cited by 789
Global Second-Order Pooling Convolutional Networks
Gao, Z., Xie, J., Wang, Q., & Li, P. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00314 · Cited by 524
Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networks for Fine-Grained Visual Recognition
Lin, T.-Y., RoyChowdhury, A., & Maji, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2017.2723400 · Cited by 328
End-to-End Representation Learning for Correlation Filter Based Tracking
Valmadre, J., Bertinetto, L., Henriques, J., Vedaldi, A., & Torr, P. H. S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.531 · Cited by 274
Image-To-Image Translation via Group-Wise Deep Whitening-And-Coloring Transformation
Cho, W., Choi, S., Park, D. K., Shin, I., & Choo, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01089 · Cited by 154
“Furthermore, computing the backpropagation with respect to singular value decomposition involved in WCT is nontrivial [30, 15].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Ionescu, C., Vantzos, O., & Sminchisescu, C.
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-12
- Pages
- 2965-2973
- OpenAlex
- W2204257188
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
