Cited by 22EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Know Your Mind: Adaptive Cognitive Activity Recognition with Reinforced CNN

Open access
Zhang, Xiang, Yao, Lina, Wang, Xianzhi, Zhang, Wenjie, Zhang, Shuai, Liu, Yunhao·2019·2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) signals reflect and measure activities in certain brain areas. Its zero clinical risk and easy-to-use features make it a good choice of providing insights into the cognitive process. However, effective analysis of time-varying EEG signals remains challenging. First, EEG signal processing and feature engineering are time-consuming and highly rely on expert knowledge, and most existing studies focus on domain-specific classification algorithms, which may not apply to other domains. Second, EEG signals usually have low signal-to-noise ratios and are more chaotic than other sensor signals. In this regard, we propose a generic EEG-based cognitive activity recognition framework that can adaptively support a wide range of cognitive applications to address the above issues. The framework uses a reinforced selective attention model to choose the characteristic information among raw EEG signals automatically. It employs a convolutional mapping operation to dynamically transform the selected information into a feature space to uncover the implicit spatial dependency of EEG sample distribution. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework under three representative scenarios: intention recognition with motor imagery EEG, person identification, and neurological diagnosis, and further evaluate it on three widely used public datasets. The experimental results show our framework outperforms multiple state-of-the-art baselines and achieves competitive accuracy on all the datasets while achieving low latency and high resilience in handling complex EEG signals across various domains. The results confirm the suitability of the proposed generic approach for a range of problems in the realm of brain-computer Interface applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdm.2019.00100

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ref. [251] employed CNN for feature extraction and a reinforced selective attention model to automatically choose the most characteristic information from multiple channels.

    “Ref. [251] employed CNN for feature extraction and a reinforced selective attention model to automatically choose the most characteristic information from multiple channels.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. C. V. Russoniello, K. OBrien, and J. M. Parks, "The effectiveness of casual video games in improving mood and decreasing stress," Journal of CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 53-66, 2009.
  2. X. Zhang, L. Yao, S. S. Kanhere, Y. Liu, T. Gu, and K. Chen, "Mindid: Person identification from brain waves through attention-based recurrent neural network," ACM IMWUT, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 149, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Yao, L., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, S., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-11
Pages
896-905
ISSN
1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003385856
Cited by
22
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
adaptive feature selection, EEG motor imagery, intent classification, personal identification, neurological diagnosis, brain-computer interface, low signal-to-noise ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review