Cited by 42Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Multi-modality Sensor Data Classification with Selective Attention

Open access
Zhang, Xiang, Yao, Lina, Huang, Chaoran, Wang, Sen, Tan, Mingkui, Long, Guodong, Wang, Can·2018·Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Multimodel wearable sensor data classificationplays an important role in ubiquitous computingand has a wide range of applications in variousscenarios from healthcare to entertainment. How-ever, most of the existing work in this field em-ploys domain-specific approaches and is thus inef-fective in complex situations where multi-modalitysensor data is collected. Moreover, the wearablesensor data is less informative than the conven-tional data such as texts or images. In this paper,to improve the adaptability of such classificationmethods across different application contexts, weturn this classification task into a game and applya deep reinforcement learning scheme to dynami-cally deal with complex situations. We also intro-duce a selective attention mechanism into the rein-forcement learning scheme to focus on the crucialdimensions of the data. This mechanism helps tocapture extra information from the signal, and canthus significantly improve the discriminative powerof the classifier. We carry out several experimentson three wearable sensor datasets, and demonstratecompetitive performance of the proposed approachcompared to several state-of-the-art baselines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2018/432

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhang et al. proposed combining reinforcement learning and LSTM to improve adaptability of different kinds of sensors, including EEG, RFID, and wearable IMU.

    “In addition, Zhang et al. [249] proposed to combine reinforcement learning and LSTM model to improve the adaptability of different kinds of sensors, including EEG (EID dataset), RFID (RSSI dataset) [250], and wearable IMU (PAMAP2 dataset) [91].”
  • One common way to improve robustness is to leverage the benefits of multiple types of sensors together to create multi-sensory systems.

    “One common way to improve robustness is to leverage the benefits of multiple types of sensors together to create multi-sensory systems [249,310,311,312,313,314].”
  • Multi-sensory networks in some cases are integrated with attention modules to learn the most representative and discriminative sensor modality to distinguish human activities.

    “Multi-sensory networks in some cases are integrated with attention modules to learn the most representative and discriminative sensor modality to distinguish human activities [249].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Alok Chowdhury, Dian Tjon- dronegoro, Vinod Chandran, and Stewart Trost. Physical activity recognition using posterior-adapted class-based fusion of multi-accelerometers data. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2017.
  2. Tokic, 2010] Michel Tokic. Adaptive ε-greedy exploration in reinforcement learning based on value differences. In Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 203- 210. Springer, 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Yao, L., Huang, C., Wang, S., Tan, M., Long, G., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2018-07
Pages
3111-3117
OpenAlex
W2964082633
Cited by
41
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
wearable sensors, selective attention, deep reinforcement learning, ubiquitous computing, healthcare monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review