PreprintCited by 3,300Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence in GamesAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Wang, Ziyu, Schaul, Tom, Hessel, Matteo, van Hasselt, Hado, Lanctot, Marc, de Freitas, Nando·2015·arXiv

Abstract

In recent years there have been many successes of using deep representations in reinforcement learning. Still, many of these applications use conventional architectures, such as convolutional networks, LSTMs, or auto-encoders. In this paper, we present a new neural network architecture for model-free reinforcement learning. Our dueling network represents two separate estimators: one for the state value function and one for the state-dependent action advantage function. The main benefit of this factoring is to generalize learning across actions without imposing any change to the underlying reinforcement learning algorithm. Our results show that this architecture leads to better policy evaluation in the presence of many similar-valued actions. Moreover, the dueling architecture enables our RL agent to outperform the state-of-the-art on the Atari 2600 domain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1511.06581

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Ba, J., Mnih, V., and Kavukcuoglu, K. Multiple object recognition with visual attention. In ICLR , 2015.
  2. Bellemare, M. G., Naddaf, Y., Veness, J., and Bowling, M. The arcade learning environment: An evaluation platform for general agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 47:253-279, 2013.
  3. Bellemare, M. G., Ostrovski, G., Guez, A., Thomas, P. S., and Munos, R. Increasing the action gap: New operators for reinforcement learning. In AAAI , 2016. To appear.
  4. Bengio, Y., Boulanger-Lewandowski, N., and Pascanu, R. Advances in optimizing recurrent networks. In ICASSP , pp. 8624-8628, 2013.
  5. Guo, X., Singh, S., Lee, H., Lewis, R. L., and Wang, X. Deep learning for real-time Atari game play using offline Monte-Carlo tree search planning. In NIPS , pp. 33383346. 2014.
  6. Harmon, M.E., Baird, L.C., and Klopf, A.H. Advantage updating applied to a differential game. In G. Tesauro, D.S. Touretzky and Leen, T.K. (eds.), NIPS , 1995.
  7. Levine, S., Finn, C., Darrell, T., and Abbeel, P. End-toend training of deep visuomotor policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.00702 , 2015. · arXiv
  8. Lin, L.J. Reinforcement learning for robots using neural networks . PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 1993.
  9. Maddison, C. J., Huang, A., Sutskever, I., and Silver, D. Move Evaluation in Go Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. In ICLR , 2015.
  10. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S., and Hassabis, D. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature , 518 (7540):529-533, 2015.
  11. Nair, A., Srinivasan, P., Blackwell, S., Alcicek, C., Fearon, R., Maria, A. De, Panneershelvam, V., Suleyman, M., Beattie, C., Petersen, S., Legg, S., Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., and Silver, D. Massively parallel methods for deep reinforcement learning. In Deep Learning Workshop, ICML , 2015.
  12. Schaul, T., Quan, J., Antonoglou, I., and Silver, D. Prioritized experience replay. In ICLR , 2016.
  13. Schulman, J., Moritz, P., Levine, S., Jordan, M. I., and Abbeel, P. High-dimensional continuous control using generalized advantage estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02438, 2015. · arXiv
  14. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C.J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., and Hassabis, D. Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature , 529(7587):484-489, 01 2016.
  15. Stadie, B. C., Levine, S., and Abbeel, P. Incentivizing exploration in reinforcement learning with deep predictive models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.00814 , 2015. · arXiv
  16. Sutton, R. S. and Barto, A. G. Introduction to reinforcement learning . MIT Press, 1998.
  17. Sutton, R. S., Mcallester, D., Singh, S., and Mansour, Y. Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation. In NIPS , pp. 1057-1063, 2000.
  18. van Hasselt, H. Double Q-learning. NIPS , 23:2613-2621, 2010.
  19. van Seijen, H., van Hasselt, H., Whiteson, S., and Wiering, M. A theoretical and empirical analysis of Expected Sarsa. In IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning , pp. 177-184. 2009.
  20. Watter, M., Springenberg, J. T., Boedecker, J., and Riedmiller, M. A. Embed to control: A locally linear latent dynamics model for control from raw images. In NIPS , 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Schaul, T., Hessel, M., van Hasselt, H., Lanctot, M., & de Freitas, N.
Affiliations
Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2173564293
Cited by
3,300
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 231 · 2024: 490 · 2023: 491 · 2022: 412 · 2021: 550 · 2020: 463 · 2019: 361 · 2018: 195 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
deep reinforcement learning, model-free reinforcement learning, state value function, policy evaluation, Atari 2600

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review