Cited by 421Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesDigital Media Forensic DetectionChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption

A robust content based digital signature for image authentication

Schneider, M., Shih-Fu Chang·2002·Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

Abstract

A methodology for designing content based digital signatures which can be used to authenticate images is presented. A continuous measure of authenticity is presented which forms the basis of this methodology. Using this methodology signature systems can be designed which allow certain types of image modification (e.g. lossy compression) but which prevent other types of manipulation. Some experience with content based signatures is also presented. The idea of signature based authentication is extended to video, and a system to generate signatures for video sequences is presented. This signature also allows smaller segments of the secured video to be verified as unmanipulated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icip.1996.560425

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, M., & Chang, S.-F.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2002-12-24
Volume
3
Pages
227-230
ISSN
1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115247187
Cited by
421
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
16.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Keywords
image authentication, image forgery detection, lossy compression, video authentication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review