The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The SEMAINE corpus of emotionally coloured character interactions
Open accessAbstract
We have recorded a new corpus of emotionally coloured conversations. Users were recorded while holding conversations with an operator who adopts in sequence four roles designed to evoke emotional reactions. The operator and the user are seated in separate rooms; they see each other through teleprompter screens, and hear each other through speakers. To allow high quality recording, they are recorded by five high-resolution, high framerate cameras, and by four microphones. All sensor information is recorded synchronously, with an accuracy of 25 μs. In total, we have recorded 20 participants, for a total of 100 character conversational and 50 non-conversational recordings of approximately 5 minutes each. All recorded conversations have been fully transcribed and annotated for five affective dimensions and partially annotated for 27 other dimensions. The corpus has been made available to the scientific community through a web-accessible database.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Valdez, P., & Mehrabian, A. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.123.4.394 · Cited by 1,104 · cited 1×
“For humans however, it is more informative to use the colour image [8].”
Method(1984) · doi:10.4324/9781315798806-24 · Cited by 1,061
Cited by
Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy
Baltrusaitis, T., Ahuja, C., & Morency, L.-P. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2798607 · Cited by 5,018
Openface 2.0: facial behavior analysis toolkit
Baltrusaitis, T., Zadeh, A., Lim, Y. C., & Morency, L.-P. (2018) · 2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2018) · doi:10.1109/fg.2018.00019 · Cited by 1,861
A Multimodal Database for Affect Recognition and Implicit Tagging
Soleymani, M., Lichtenauer, J., Pun, T., & Pantic, M. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2011.25 · Cited by 1,664
Self-citationStatic facial expression analysis in tough conditions: Data, evaluation protocol and benchmark
Dhall, A., Goecke, R., Lucey, S., & Gedeon, T. (2011) · 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops) · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2011.6130508 · Cited by 541
Towards multimodal sentiment analysis: harvesting opinions from the web
Morency, L.-P., Mihalcea, R., & Doshi, P. (2011) · Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces · doi:10.1145/2070481.2070509 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- McKeown, G., Valstar, M. F., Cowie, R., & Pantic, M.
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-07
- Pages
- 1079-1084
- OpenAlex
- W2135776491
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 63.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The SEMAINE corpus of emotionally coloured character interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icme.2010.5583006
- The paper
- McKeown, G., Valstar, M. F., Cowie, R., & Pantic, M. (2010). The SEMAINE corpus of emotionally coloured character interactions. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. https://doi.org/10.1109/icme.2010.5583006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
