Cited by 17Smart Grid Energy ManagementEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityEducational Games and Gamification

A Novel Graphical Lasso Based Approach Towards Segmentation Analysis in Energy Game-Theoretic Frameworks

Open access
Das, Hari Prasanna, Konstantakopoulos, Ioannis C., Manasawala, Aummul Baneen, Veeravalli, Tanya, Liu, Huihan, Spanos, Costas J.·2019·2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Machine Learning And Applications (ICMLA)

Abstract

Energy game-theoretic frameworks have emerged to be a successful strategy to encourage energy efficient behavior in large scale by leveraging human-in-the-loop strategy. A number of such frameworks have been introduced over the years which formulate the energy saving process as a competitive game with appropriate incentives for energy efficient players. However, prior works involve an incentive design mechanism which is dependent on knowledge of utility functions for all the players in the game, which is hard to compute especially when the number of players is high, common in energy game-theoretic frameworks. Our research proposes that the utilities of players in such a framework can be grouped together to a relatively small number of clusters, and the clusters can then be targeted with tailored incentives. The key to above segmentation analysis is to learn the features leading to human decision making towards energy usage in competitive environments. We propose a novel graphical lasso based approach to perform such segmentation, by studying the feature correlations in a real-world energy social game dataset. To further improve the explainability of the model, we perform causality study using grangers causality. Proposed segmentation analysis results in characteristic clusters demonstrating different energy usage behaviors. We also present avenues to implement intelligent incentive design using proposed segmentation method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icmla.2019.00277

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Energy game-theoretic frameworks can incentivize occupants to minimize energy demand, and ML can help develop tailored incentives.

    “Energy game-theoretic frameworks can also incentivize occupants to actively minimize their energy demand, and ML can help here to develop tailored incentives based on different energy usage behaviors [159].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [159]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32][32] Lydia T. Liu, Sarah Dean, Esther Rolf, Max Simchowitz, and Moritz Hardt. Delayed impact of fair machine learning. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 3150-3158. PMLR, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, H. P., Konstantakopoulos, I. C., Manasawala, A. B., Veeravalli, T., Liu, H., & Spanos, C. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Machine Learning And Applications (ICMLA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-12
OpenAlex
W2978534880
Cited by
17
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7
FWCI
4.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
Keywords
graphical lasso, customer segmentation, incentive design, energy efficiency, human-in-the-loop, feature correlation, Granger causality, social games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review