Oscillator-based walking assistance: A model-free approach
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we further develop our framework to design new assistance and rehabilitation protocols based on motor primitives. In particular, we extend our recent results of oscillator-based assistance to the case of walking. The adaptive oscillator used in this paper is capable of predicting the angular position of the user's joints in the future, based on the pattern learned during preceding cycles. Assistance is then provided by attracting the joints to this future position using a force field in a compliant lower-limb exoskeleton. To demonstrate the method efficiency, we computed the rate of metabolic energy expended by the participants during a walking task, with and without assistance. Results show a significant decrease of energy expenditure with the assistance switched on, although not to a point to entirely compensate for the burden due to the exoskeleton lack of transparency. The results further show changes in the kinematics: with assistance, the participants walked with a faster cadence and ampler movements. These results tend to prove the relevance of designing assistance protocols based on adaptive oscillators (or primitives in general) and pave the way to the design of new rehabilitation protocols.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent control concept uses adaptive oscillators that synchronize with sinusoidal high-level features of the user's movements, supporting arbitrary rhythmic movements without reference trajectories.
“In a recent control concept, the haptic controller does not rely on reference trajectories and supports arbitrary rhythmic movements of the user.To do so, the controller uses adaptive oscillators that synchronize with the sinusoidal high-level features of the user's movements (Ronsse, Koopman et al., 2011;Ronsse et al., 2010;Ronsse, Vitiello, et al., 2011).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Ronsse, Koopman et al., 2011
The control of most haptic guidance feedback strategies is based on reference trajectories, except for zero impedance control and a few model-based algorithms.
“The control of most haptic guidance feedback strategies is based upon reference trajectories, except for zero impedance control and a few model-based control algorithms (Ronsse, Koopman, et al., 2011;Ronsse et al., 2010;Ronsse, Vitiello, et al., 2011).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Ronsse, Koopman, et al., 2011
Cites
Robot assisted gait training with Active Leg Exoskeleton (ALEX)
Banala, S. K., Kim, S. H., Agrawal, S. K., & Scholz, J. P. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2008.2008280 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8 · Cited by 1,416 · see citing works
Lim, B., Choi, B., Roh, C., Lee, J., Kim, Y.-J., & Lee, Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95599-2 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ronsse, R., Koopman, B., Vitiello, N., Lenzi, T., De Rossi, S. M. M., van den Kieboom, J., van Asseldonk, E., Carrozza, M. C., van der Kooij, H., & Ijspeert, A. J.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
- Venue
- 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 2011
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 1945-7898 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138408085
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 14.20
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- infoscience.epfl.ch
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- gait assistance, adaptive oscillators, motor primitives, lower limb exoskeleton, force fields, metabolic cost, gait kinematics, rehabilitation protocols, model-free control
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Models, Theoretical, Robotics, Walking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review