Cited by 751Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsStroke Rehabilitation and RecoverySpinal Cord Injury Research

Robot assisted gait training with Active Leg Exoskeleton (ALEX)

Banala, Sai K., Kim, Seok Hun, Agrawal, Sunil K., Scholz, John P.·2009·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Gait training of stroke survivors is crucial to facilitate neuromuscular plasticity needed for improvements in functional walking ability. Robot assisted gait training (RAGT) was developed for stroke survivors using active leg exoskeleton (ALEX) and a force-field controller, which uses assist-as-needed paradigm for rehabilitation. In this paradigm undesirable gait motion is resisted and assistance is provided towards desired motion. The force-field controller achieves this paradigm by effectively applying forces at the ankle of the subject through actuators on the hip and knee joints. Two stroke survivors participated in a 15-session gait training study each with ALEX. The results show that by the end of the training the gait pattern of the patients improved and became closer to a healthy subject's gait pattern. Improvement is seen as an increase in the size of the patients' gait pattern, increased knee and ankle joint excursions and increase in their walking speeds on the treadmill.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2008.2008280

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After training with ALEX, stroke survivors' gait pattern is closer to a healthy gait pattern with increased gait size and walking speeds.

    “After training with ALEX, the patients' gait pattern are closer to a healthy gait pattern with increased gait size and walking speeds.”
  • The effectiveness of ALEX has been demonstrated through clinical trials with stroke survivors.

    “The effectiveness of ALEX has been demonstrated through clinical trials with stroke survivors [28], [29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banala, S. K., Kim, S. H., Agrawal, S. K., & Scholz, J. P.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2009-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
2-8
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2163208146
Cited by
751
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 35
FWCI
12.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 38582, R01HD038582)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
Keywords
robot-assisted gait training, stroke rehabilitation, gait pattern, walking speed, treadmill gait
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Algorithms, Ankle, Equipment Design, Gait, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Robotics, Walking, Treatment Outcome, Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review