Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continuous-time batch estimation using temporal basis functions

Furgale, Paul, Barfoot, Timothy D., Sibley, Gabe·2012·2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Abstract

Roboticists often formulate estimation problems in discrete time for the practical reason of keeping the state size tractable. However, the discrete-time approach does not scale well for use with high-rate sensors, such as inertial measurement units or sweeping laser imaging sensors. The difficulty lies in the fact that a pose variable is typically included for every time at which a measurement is acquired, rendering the dimension of the state impractically large for large numbers of measurements. This issue is exacerbated for the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem, which further augments the state to include landmark variables. To address this tractability issue, we propose to move the full maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) problem into continuous time and use temporal basis functions to keep the state size manageable. We present a full probabilistic derivation of the continuous-time estimation problem, derive an estimator based on the assumption that the densities and processes involved are Gaussian, and show how coefficients of a relatively small number of basis functions can form the state to be estimated, making the solution efficient. Our derivation is presented in steps of increasingly specific assumptions, opening the door to the development of other novel continuous-time estimation algorithms through the application of different assumptions at any point. We use the SLAM problem as our motivation throughout the paper, although the approach is not specific to this application. Results from a self-calibration experiment involving a camera and a high-rate inertial measurement unit are provided to validate the approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2012.6225005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509636 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1177/0278364910370376 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/0278364906072768 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1023/A:1007941100561 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/MAES.2010.5546308 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1364/JOSAA.4.000629 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1177/0278364910369268 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152851 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/s11263-011-0465-8 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0278364909356812 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0278364910388963 · DOI · Paper page
  12. plagemann, 0, Gaussian beam processes: A nonparametric Bayesian measurement model for range finders, Proceedings of Robotics Science and Systems (RSS) Atlanta GA USA 2007
  13. 10.1007/s10514-010-9213-0 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/CRV.2012.35 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/CVPR.2001.991037 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10846-010-9490-z · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1177/0278364906065387 · DOI · Paper page
  18. nocedal, 2006, Numerical Optimization
  19. 10.1007/s003710050206 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/027836498600500404 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/0278364910382802 · DOI · Paper page
  22. thrun, 2001, Probabilistic Robotics
  23. de boor, 2001, A practical Guide to Splines
  24. 10.1115/1.3658902 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_38 · DOI
  26. 10.1023/A:1024265401576 · doi:10.1023/a:1024265401576
  27. 10.1109/MRA.2006.1678144 · DOI · Paper page
  28. hughes, 1986, Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics
  29. 10.1007/978-1-4613-8997-2_14 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1109/TRO.2008.2004486 · DOI · Paper page
  31. jazwinski, 1970, Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Furgale, P., Barfoot, T. D., & Sibley, G.
Venue
2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-05
Pages
2088-2095
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114084853
Cited by
259
References
3
FWCI
22.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous-time batch estimation using temporal basis functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icra.2012.6225005
The paper
Furgale, P., Barfoot, T. D., & Sibley, G. (2012). Continuous-time batch estimation using temporal basis functions. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2012.6225005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.