The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous-time batch estimation using temporal basis functions
Abstract
Roboticists often formulate estimation problems in discrete time for the practical reason of keeping the state size tractable. However, the discrete-time approach does not scale well for use with high-rate sensors, such as inertial measurement units or sweeping laser imaging sensors. The difficulty lies in the fact that a pose variable is typically included for every time at which a measurement is acquired, rendering the dimension of the state impractically large for large numbers of measurements. This issue is exacerbated for the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem, which further augments the state to include landmark variables. To address this tractability issue, we propose to move the full maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) problem into continuous time and use temporal basis functions to keep the state size manageable. We present a full probabilistic derivation of the continuous-time estimation problem, derive an estimator based on the assumption that the densities and processes involved are Gaussian, and show how coefficients of a relatively small number of basis functions can form the state to be estimated, making the solution efficient. Our derivation is presented in steps of increasingly specific assumptions, opening the door to the development of other novel continuous-time estimation algorithms through the application of different assumptions at any point. We use the SLAM problem as our motivation throughout the paper, although the approach is not specific to this application. Results from a self-calibration experiment involving a camera and a high-rate inertial measurement unit are provided to validate the approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Simultaneous localization and mapping: part I
Durrant-Whyte, H., & Bailey, T. (2006) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2006.1638022 · Cited by 4,199
A hybrid SLAM representation for dynamic marine environments
Bibby, C., & Reid, I. (2010) · 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.2010.5509262 · Cited by 53 · cited 1×
“The work that is most closely related to ours is that of Bibby et al. [26].”
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509636 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0278364910370376 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0278364906072768 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1007941100561 · DOI
- 10.1109/MAES.2010.5546308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1364/JOSAA.4.000629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0278364910369268 · DOI
- 10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152851 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11263-011-0465-8 · DOI
- 10.1177/0278364909356812 · DOI
- 10.1177/0278364910388963 · DOI · Paper page
- plagemann, 0, Gaussian beam processes: A nonparametric Bayesian measurement model for range finders, Proceedings of Robotics Science and Systems (RSS) Atlanta GA USA 2007
- 10.1007/s10514-010-9213-0 · DOI
- 10.1109/CRV.2012.35 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2001.991037 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10846-010-9490-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0278364906065387 · DOI · Paper page
- nocedal, 2006, Numerical Optimization
- 10.1007/s003710050206 · DOI
- 10.1177/027836498600500404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0278364910382802 · DOI · Paper page
- thrun, 2001, Probabilistic Robotics
- de boor, 2001, A practical Guide to Splines
- 10.1115/1.3658902 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_38 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1024265401576 · doi:10.1023/a:1024265401576
- 10.1109/MRA.2006.1678144 · DOI · Paper page
- hughes, 1986, Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-8997-2_14 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TRO.2008.2004486 · DOI · Paper page
- jazwinski, 1970, Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory
Cited by
Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age
Cadena, C., Carlone, L., Carrillo, H., Latif, Y., Scaramuzza, D., Neira, J., Reid, I., & Leonard, J. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2624754 · Cited by 3,596
Low-drift and real-time lidar odometry and mapping
Zhang, J., & Singh, S. (2017) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-016-9548-2 · Cited by 820
A UAV system for inspection of industrial facilities
Nikolic, J., Burri, M., Rehder, J., Leutenegger, S., Huerzeler, C., & Siegwart, R. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference · doi:10.1109/aero.2013.6496959 · Cited by 251
A Spline-Based Trajectory Representation for Sensor Fusion and Rolling Shutter Cameras
Patron-Perez, A., Lovegrove, S., & Sibley, G. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0811-3 · Cited by 104
Self-citationBatch nonlinear continuous-time trajectory estimation as exactly sparse Gaussian process regression
Anderson, S., Barfoot, T. D., Tong, C. H., & Särkkä, S. (2015) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-015-9455-y · Cited by 87
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Furgale, P., Barfoot, T. D., & Sibley, G.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-05
- Pages
- 2088-2095
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114084853
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous-time batch estimation using temporal basis functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icra.2012.6225005
- The paper
- Furgale, P., Barfoot, T. D., & Sibley, G. (2012). Continuous-time batch estimation using temporal basis functions. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2012.6225005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.