Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simulation tools for model-based robotics: Comparison of Bullet, Havok, MuJoCo, ODE and PhysX

Erez, Tom, Tassa, Yuval, Todorov, Emanuel·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

There is growing need for software tools that can accurately simulate the complex dynamics of modern robots. While a number of candidates exist, the field is fragmented. It is difficult to select the best tool for a given project, or to predict how much effort will be needed and what the ultimate simulation performance will be. Here we introduce new quantitative measures of simulation performance, focusing on the numerical challenges that are typical for robotics as opposed to multi-body dynamics and gaming. We then present extensive simulation results, obtained within a new software framework for instantiating the same model in multiple engines and running side-by-side comparisons. Overall we find that each engine performs best on the type of system it was designed and optimized for: MuJoCo wins the robotics-related tests, while the gaming engines win the gaming-related tests without a clear leader among them. The simulations are illustrated in the accompanying movie.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2015.7139807

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Erez, T., Tassa, Y., & Todorov, E.
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-05
Pages
4397-4404
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1570792896
Cited by
312
References
13
FWCI
24.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation tools for model-based robotics: Comparison of Bullet, Havok, MuJoCo, ODE and PhysX. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icra.2015.7139807
The paper
Erez, T., Tassa, Y., & Todorov, E. (2015). Simulation tools for model-based robotics: Comparison of Bullet, Havok, MuJoCo, ODE and PhysX. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2015.7139807

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.