Cited by 17Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PROBE-GK: Predictive robust estimation using generalized kernels

Open access
Peretroukhin, Valentin, Vega-Brown, William, Roy, Nicholas, Kelly, Jonathan·2016·2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Many algorithms in computer vision and robotics make strong assumptions about uncertainty, and rely on the validity of these assumptions to produce accurate and consistent state estimates. In practice, dynamic environments may degrade sensor performance in predictable ways that cannot be captured with static uncertainty parameters. In this paper, we employ fast nonparametric Bayesian inference techniques to more accurately model sensor uncertainty. By setting a prior on observation uncertainty, we derive a predictive robust estimator, and show how our model can be learned from sample images, both with and without knowledge of the motion used to generate the data. We validate our approach through Monte Carlo simulations, and report significant improvements in localization accuracy relative to a fixed noise model in several settings, including on synthetic data, the KITTI dataset, and our own experimental platform.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2016.7487212

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pre-processed, illumination invariant images have been applied to ADS and were shown to improve localization, mapping and scene classification capabilities over long periods of time.

    “Pre-processed, illumination invariant images have applied to ADS [151] and were shown to improve localization, mapping and scene classification capabilities over long periods of time.”

    From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [151]

    The KITTI Dataset results (pp. 5–6) report improved stereo visual odometry on car-collected data, supporting the localization aspect. But the method predicts uncertainty for visual observations; the paper does not show that pre-processed, illumination-invariant images improved mapping or scene classification over long periods. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1109/IVS.2011.5940405 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248074 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/0278364913491297 · DOI · Paper page
  4. sünderhauf, 2007, Stereo odometry: A review of approaches, Chemnitz University of Technology Technical Report
  5. 10.1109/MRA.2011.943233 · DOI · Paper page
  6. forster, 2014, SVO: Fast semidirect monocular visual odometry, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Automat (ICRA) IEEE, 15
  7. 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139924 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139925 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/IROS.2015.7353890 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630557 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TRO.2014.2298059 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696609 · DOI
  13. vega-brown, 2014, Non-parametric bayesian inference on multivariate exponential families, Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2546
  14. 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408843 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6631104 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/358669.358692 · DOI · Paper page
  17. dempster, 1977, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 1, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peretroukhin, V., Vega-Brown, W., Roy, N., & Kelly, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-05
Pages
817-824
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2412342236
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
generalized kernels, Bayesian nonparametrics, state estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review