The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PROBE-GK: Predictive robust estimation using generalized kernels
Open accessAbstract
Many algorithms in computer vision and robotics make strong assumptions about uncertainty, and rely on the validity of these assumptions to produce accurate and consistent state estimates. In practice, dynamic environments may degrade sensor performance in predictable ways that cannot be captured with static uncertainty parameters. In this paper, we employ fast nonparametric Bayesian inference techniques to more accurately model sensor uncertainty. By setting a prior on observation uncertainty, we derive a predictive robust estimator, and show how our model can be learned from sample images, both with and without knowledge of the motion used to generate the data. We validate our approach through Monte Carlo simulations, and report significant improvements in localization accuracy relative to a fixed noise model in several settings, including on synthetic data, the KITTI dataset, and our own experimental platform.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pre-processed, illumination invariant images have been applied to ADS and were shown to improve localization, mapping and scene classification capabilities over long periods of time.
“Pre-processed, illumination invariant images have applied to ADS [151] and were shown to improve localization, mapping and scene classification capabilities over long periods of time.”
From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [151]
The KITTI Dataset results (pp. 5–6) report improved stereo visual odometry on car-collected data, supporting the localization aspect. But the method predicts uncertainty for visual observations; the paper does not show that pre-processed, illumination-invariant images improved mapping or scene classification over long periods. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Irani, M., & Anandan, P. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44480-7_18 · Cited by 250
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1109/IVS.2011.5940405 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248074 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0278364913491297 · DOI · Paper page
- sünderhauf, 2007, Stereo odometry: A review of approaches, Chemnitz University of Technology Technical Report
- 10.1109/MRA.2011.943233 · DOI · Paper page
- forster, 2014, SVO: Fast semidirect monocular visual odometry, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Automat (ICRA) IEEE, 15
- 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139924 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139925 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2015.7353890 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630557 · DOI
- 10.1109/TRO.2014.2298059 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696609 · DOI
- vega-brown, 2014, Non-parametric bayesian inference on multivariate exponential families, Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2546
- 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408843 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6631104 · DOI
- 10.1145/358669.358692 · DOI · Paper page
- dempster, 1977, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 1, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies
Yurtsever, E., Lambert, J., Carballo, A., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2983149 · Cited by 1,889
“Both attempting to extract lighting invariant features [147] and assessing the quality of features [148] have been proposed.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Peretroukhin, V., Vega-Brown, W., Roy, N., & Kelly, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-05
- Pages
- 817-824
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2412342236
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- generalized kernels, Bayesian nonparametrics, state estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review