Cited by 607Smart Agriculture and AIAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Deep fruit detection in orchards

Open access
Bargoti, Suchet, Underwood, James·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

An accurate and reliable image based fruit detection system is critical for supporting higher level agriculture tasks such as yield mapping and robotic harvesting. This paper presents the use of a state-of-the-art object detection framework, Faster R-CNN, in the context of fruit detection in orchards, including mangoes, almonds and apples. Ablation studies are presented to better understand the practical deployment of the detection network, including how much training data is required to capture variability in the dataset. Data augmentation techniques are shown to yield significant performance gains, resulting in a greater than two-fold reduction in the number of training images required. In contrast, transferring knowledge between orchards contributed to negligible performance gain over initialising the Deep Convolutional Neural Network directly from ImageNet features. Finally, to operate over orchard data containing between 100-1000 fruit per image, a tiling approach is introduced for the Faster R-CNN framework. The study has resulted in the best yet detection performance for these orchards relative to previous works, with an F1-score of > 0.9 achieved for apples and mangoes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2017.7989417

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In real-world AIoT systems, there are always many related tasks involved, e.g., object detection and tracking, and semantic segmentation in video surveillance. Therefore, finding transfer learning dependencies across these tasks and leveraging such prior knowledge to learn better models are of practical value for AIoT [199], [200], [201], [202].

    “In real-world AIoT systems, there are always many related tasks involved, e.g., object detection and tracking, and semantic segmentation in video surveillance. Therefore, finding the transfer learning dependencies across these tasks and leveraging such prior knowledge to learn better models, are of practical value for AIoT [199], [200], [201], [202].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. S. Bargoti and J. Underwood, "Image Segmentation for Fruit Detection and Yield Estimation in Apple Orchards," Journal of Field Robotics (accepted, under revision), 2016.
  2. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, "Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks," in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2012, pp. 1097-1105.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bargoti, S., & Underwood, J.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-05
Pages
3626-3633
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2537458488
Cited by
607
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 3
FWCI
154.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • University of Sydney
  • Australian Centre for Field Robotics
  • Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Australian Government
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
fruit detection, orchards, Faster R-CNN, object detection, mango, almond, apple, data augmentation, transfer learning, tiling, training data requirements, robotic harvesting, yield mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review