Cited by 107Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsSoft Robotics and Applications

Learning Rope Manipulation Policies Using Dense Object Descriptors Trained on Synthetic Depth Data

Open access
Sundaresan, Priya, Grannen, Jennifer, Thananjeyan, Brijen, Balakrishna, Ashwin, Laskey, Michael, Stone, Kevin, Gonzalez, Joseph E., Goldberg, Ken·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Robotic manipulation of deformable 1D objects such as ropes, cables, and hoses is challenging due to the lack of high-fidelity analytic models and large configuration spaces. Furthermore, learning end-to-end manipulation policies directly from images and physical interaction requires significant time on a robot and can fail to generalize across tasks. We address these challenges using interpretable deep visual representations for rope, extending recent work on dense object descriptors for robot manipulation. This facilitates the design of interpretable and transferable geometric policies built on top of the learned representations, decoupling visual reasoning and control. We present an approach that learns point-pair correspondences between initial and goal rope configurations, which implicitly encodes geometric structure, entirely in simulation from synthetic depth images. We demonstrate that the learned representation — dense depth object descriptors (DDODs) — can be used to manipulate a real rope into a variety of different arrangements either by learning from demonstrations or using interpretable geometric policies. In 50 trials of a knot-tying task with the ABB YuMi Robot, the system achieves a 66% knot-tying success rate from previously unseen configurations. See https://tinyurl.com/rope-learning for supplementary material and videos.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197121

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sundaresan et al. achieved 66% real-world success in tying the overhand-knot by improving the descriptor perception system within the LfO framework.

    “Sundaresan et al. (2020) [250] achieve 66% real-world success in tying the overhand-knot by improving the descriptor perception system—it can tell the exact location of the individual part of the rope in the image—within the LfO framework.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sundaresan, P., Grannen, J., Thananjeyan, B., Balakrishna, A., Laskey, M., Stone, K., Gonzalez, J. E., & Goldberg, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Toyota Research Institute (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-05
Pages
9411-9418
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3090004508
Cited by
107
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 5
FWCI
27.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
rope manipulation, deformable object manipulation, knot tying, imitation learning, robotic manipulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review