Cited by 26Robot Manipulation and LearningSoft Robotics and ApplicationsReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Untangling Dense Non-Planar Knots by Learning Manipulation Features and Recovery Policies

Open access
Sundaresan*, Priya, Grannen*, Jennifer, Thananjeyan, Brijen, Balakrishna, Ashwin, Ichnowski, Jeffrey, Novoseller, Ellen, Hwang, Minho, Laskey, Michael +2 more·2021·Robotics: Science and Systems XVII

Abstract

Robot manipulation for untangling 1D deformable structures such as ropes, cables, and wires is challenging due to their infinite dimensional configuration space, complex dynamics, and tendency to self-occlude.Analytical controllers often fail in the presence of dense configurations, due to the difficulty of grasping between adjacent cable segments.We present two algorithms that enhance robust cable untangling, LOKI and SPi-DERMan, which operate alongside HULK, a high-level planner from prior work.LOKI uses a learned model of manipulation features to refine a coarse grasp keypoint prediction to a precise, optimized location and orientation, while SPiDERMan uses a learned model to sense task progress and apply recovery actions.We evaluate these algorithms in physical cable untangling experiments with 336 knots and over 1500 actions on real cables using the da Vinci surgical robot.We find that the combination of HULK, LOKI, and SPiDERMan is able to untangle dense overhand, figure-eight, double-overhand, square, bowline, granny, stevedore, and triple-overhand knots.The composition of these methods successfully untangles a cable from a dense initial configuration in 68.3% of 60 physical experiments and achieves 50% higher success rates than baselines from prior work.Supplementary material, code, and videos can be found at https://tinyurl.com/rssuntangling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15607/rss.2021.xvii.013

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Peter Kazanzides, Zihan Chen, Anton Deguet, Gregory S. Fischer, Russell H. Taylor, and Simon P. DiMaio. An open-source research kit for the da Vinci surgical system. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sundaresan*, P., Grannen*, J., Thananjeyan, B., Balakrishna, A., Ichnowski, J., Novoseller, E., Hwang, M., Laskey, M., Gonzalez, J., & Goldberg, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Toyota Research Institute (US)
Venue
Robotics: Science and Systems XVII
Published
2021-07-12
OpenAlex
W3174282793
Cited by
26
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Robotics: Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1637789, 1637759, 1637444)
  • University of Washington (IIS 1637444, 1637444)
  • Johns Hopkins University (IIS 1637789)
  • Intuitive Surgical
  • Toyota Research Institute
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute (IIS 1637759)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
deformable structures, robotic manipulation, recovery policy, da Vinci surgical robot, figure-eight knot, self-occlusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review