Ferroelectric FET analog synapse for acceleration of deep neural network training
Abstract
The memory requirement of at-scale deep neural networks (DNN) dictate that synaptic weight values be stored and updated in off-chip memory such as DRAM, limiting the energy efficiency and training time. Monolithic cross-bar / pseudo cross-bar arrays with analog non-volatile memories capable of storing and updating weights on-chip offer the possibility of accelerating DNN training. Here, we harness the dynamics of voltage controlled partial polarization switching in ferroelectric-FETs (FeFET) to demonstrate such an analog synapse. We develop a transient Presiach model that accurately predicts minor loop trajectories and remnant polarization charge (Pr) for arbitrary pulse width, voltage, and history. We experimentally demonstrate a 5-bit FeFET synapse with symmetric potentiation and depression characteristics, and a 45x tunable range in conductance with 75ns update pulse. A circuit macro-model is used to evaluate and benchmark on-chip learning performance (area, latency, energy, accuracy) of FeFET synaptic core revealing a 103to 106acceleration in online learning latency over multi-state RRAM based analog synapses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These techniques can be more generally applied to other non-volatile resistive memory technologies such as phase-change memory, magnetoresistive RAM and ferroelectric field-effect transistors.
“These techniques can be more generally applied to other non-volatile resistive memory technologies such as phase-change memory8,17,21,23,24, magnetoresistive RAM48 and ferroelectric field-effect transistors49.”
From A compute-in-memory chip based on resistive random-access memory (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
The proposed VMM accelerator achieves a smaller footprint compared to [32], [33], [34], and [35].
“whereas our proposed VMM accelerator achieves a smaller footprint compared to [32], [33], [34], and [35].”
From Framework for In-Memory Computing Based on Memristor and Memcapacitor for On-Chip Training (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems
Jo, S. H., Chang, T., Ebong, I., Bhadviya, B. B., Mazumder, P., & Lu, W. (2010) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl904092h · Cited by 4,174 · cited 6× · see citing works
“increased learning accuracy Ideal [4] [5]”
BackgroundInfluentialWoo, J., Moon, K., Song, J., Lee, S., Kwak, M., Park, J., & Hwang, H. (2016) · IEEE Electron Device Letters · doi:10.1109/led.2016.2582859 · Cited by 512 · cited 6× · see citing works
“[2] J. Woo, et al., “Improved synaptic behavior under identical pulses using AlOx/HfO2 bilayer RRAM array for neuromorphic systems,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., 37, 8, 994–997, 2016.”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuro-Inspired Computing With Emerging Nonvolatile Memorys
Yu, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2018.2790840 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Self-citationA compute-in-memory chip based on resistive random-access memory
Wan, W., Kubendran, R., Schaefer, C., Eryilmaz, S. B., Zhang, W., Wu, D., Deiss, S., Raina, P., Qian, H., Gao, B., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04992-8 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Peng, X., Huang, S., Jiang, H., Lu, A., & Yu, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2020.3043731 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Self-citationPerspective: A review on memristive hardware for neuromorphic computation
Sung, C., Hwang, H., & Yoo, I. K. (2018) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5037835 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Ning, H., Yu, Z., Zhang, Q., Wen, H., Gao, B., Mao, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., Chen, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01343-0 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Sun, X., & Yu, S. (2019) · IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/jetcas.2019.2933148 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citationStrategies to Improve the Accuracy of Memristor-Based Convolutional Neural Networks
Pan, W.-Q., Chen, J., Kuang, R., Li, Y., He, Y.-H., Feng, G.-R., Duan, N., Chang, T.-C., & Miao, X.-S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · doi:10.1109/ted.2019.2963323 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Framework for In-Memory Computing Based on Memristor and Memcapacitor for On-Chip Training
Singh, A., & Lee, B.-G. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3324375 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jerry, M., Chen, P.-Y., Zhang, J., Sharma, P., Ni, K., Yu, S., & Datta, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-12
- Pages
- 6.2.1-6.2.4
- ISSN
- 0163-1918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787453651
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 15
- FWCI
- 55.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Technical digest - International Electron Devices Meeting/Technical digest (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Keywords
- ferroelectric field-effect transistors, analog synapses, deep neural network training, remnant polarization, conductance tuning, synaptic potentiation and depression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review