Cited by 18Digital Innovation in IndustriesDigital Transformation in IndustryDigital Economy and Transformation

Methodology for Digitalization - A Conceptual Model

Ng, H. Y., Tan, P. S., Lim, Y. G.·2018·2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)

Abstract

This paper reviews the business model and digital capability literatures for tools and techniques related to digital transformation. The theoretical gap identified from the review, combined with findings gathered from a preliminary study with 20 companies in the manufacturing and logistics sector of Singapore highlight the market need for a methodology for digitalization. Based on the inputs gathered from experts familiar with the digital technologies and business transformation, this paper presents a 5-stage conceptual model for a digitalization methodology. The conceptual provides a general structure that defines the key stages of digitalization and their interdependencies, and highlights some future research directions for refining the model for the development of a practical methodology for digitalization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ieem.2018.8607457

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ng et al. [54] developed a conceptual model to guide firms to systematically develop action plans for digitalization, based on inputs gathered from experts of digital technologies and business transformation in manufacturing firms, encompassing five stages: (1) assessment of current business model; (2) design of digital business model; (3) assessment of current digital capabilities; (4)

    “Based on the inputs gathered from experts of digital technologies and business transformation in manufacturing firms, a conceptual model to guide firms to systematically develop action plans for digitalization has been developed by Ng et al. [54].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, H. Y., Tan, P. S., & Lim, Y. G.
Affiliations
Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology (SG)
Venue
2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-12
Pages
1269-1273
OpenAlex
W2909417386
Cited by
18
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Economy and Transformation
Keywords
digital transformation, business models, digital capabilities, conceptual model, manufacturing industry, logistics industry, business transformation, digital technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review