Cited by 40Soft Robotics and ApplicationsNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting respiratory motion for active canceling during percutaneous needle insertion

Riviere, C.N., Thakral, A., Iordachita, I.I., Mitroi, G., Stoianovici, D.·2005·2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

Abstract

Prediction of bodily motion due to respiration was investigated preparatory to implementation of active compensation for respiration in a robot-assisted system for percutaneous kidney surgery. Data for preliminary testing were recorded from the chest wall of a subject using an optical displacement sensor. The weighted-frequency Fourier linear combiner algorithms an adaptive modeling: algorithm, was used to model and predict respiratory movement. Preliminary results are presented, in which the algorithm is shown to track a 0.86 mm rms respiration signal with 0.11 mm rms error. The general robotic system and compensation scheme are also described.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iembs.2001.1019580

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. widrow, 1975, Adaptive noise canceling: principles and applications, Proc IEEE, 63, 1692, 10.1109/PROC.1975.10036 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/10704282_114 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493 · DOI
  4. thakral, 2001, Surgical Motion Adaptive Robotic Technology (S.M.A.R.T): taking the motion out of physiological motion, Fourth Intl Conf Med Image Computing Comput Asst Intervention
  5. potamianos, 1995, Intraoperative registration for percutaneous surgery, Proc Second Int Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 156
  6. 10.1109/10.18751 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BFb0029249 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Riviere, C. N., Thakral, A., Iordachita, I. I., Mitroi, G., & Stoianovici, D.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Craiova (RO)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005-08-25
Volume
4
Pages
3477-3480
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162787094
Cited by
40
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Keywords
respiratory motion prediction, percutaneous needle insertion, robotic surgery, adaptive modeling, chest wall displacement, optical displacement sensor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review