Cited by 118Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Adaptive blood pressure estimation from wearable PPG sensors using peripheral artery pulse wave velocity measurements and multi-channel blind identification of local arterial dynamics

McCombie, Devin B., Reisner, Andrew T., Asada, H. Harry·2006·2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

Abstract

A method for estimating pulse wave velocity (PWV) using circulatory waveform signals derived from multiple photoplethysmograph (PPG) sensors is described. The method employs two wearable in-line PPG sensors placed at a known distance from one another at the ulnar and digital artery. A technique for calibrating the measured pulse wave velocity to arterial blood pressure using hydrostatic pressure variation is presented. Additionally, a framework is described for estimating local arterial dynamics using PPG waveforms and multi-channel blind system ID. Initial results implementing the method on data derived from a human subject at different arterial pressures is presented. Results show that the method is capable of measuring the changes in arterial PWV that result from fluctuations in mean arterial pressure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iembs.2006.260590

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies of other variables for cuff-less BP measurement are limited by small sample sizes and a lack of external validation.

    “Several other variables have been considered to measure cuff-less BP such as pulse wave velocity and propagation in combination with deep learning algorithms; however, most of the studies are limited by small sample sizes and a lack of external validation29.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCombie, D. B., Reisner, A. T., & Asada, H. H.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2006-08
Volume
2006
Pages
3521-3524
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124909584
Cited by
118
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
blood pressure estimation, pulse wave velocity, photoplethysmography, wearable sensors, peripheral arteries, mean arterial pressure
MeSH terms
Arteries, Biomedical Engineering, Blood Pressure, Equipment Design, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypertension, Models, Cardiovascular, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Statistical, Photoplethysmography, Ulnar Artery, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review